Hi

Ok, so now what we need are at least 5 other public UT1 NTP servers so you can 
properly
synch up to a set of them. 

Bob


> On Jul 23, 2016, at 8:47 AM, Mike Cook <michael.c...@sfr.fr> wrote:
> 
> As I suspected NTP client handles the UT1 data ok if there is just that 
> server configured.
> The only issue is that the current UT1 stream has steps at 0h which NTP takes 
> time to sync to if slewing is enabled.  About 2000s in fact. The step size is 
> far less than the max offset allowed and so doesn’t provoke a step. 
> 
> I don’t have too many data points but attach here a plot of the 0h transition 
> last night. 
> Note that the the x-axis has the seconds scaled as a percentage of the number 
> of secs in a day as I couldn’t figure out how to do it otherwise.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Have a good weekend,
> Mike
> 
> 
>> Le 23 juil. 2016 à 01:21, Mike Cook <michael.c...@sfr.fr> a écrit :
>> 
>> 
>>> Le 23 juil. 2016 à 00:23, John Hawkinson <jh...@mit.edu> a écrit :
>>> 
>>> I have to wonder if it's really such a great idea to have this
>>> as an open NTP server without huge red flags that it is not UTC.
>>> One could imagine it leading to big problems if some people started
>>> syncing to it without undersatnding that it was.
>> 
>> I think that it would get rejected as a falseticker in most circumstances. 
>> Worth looking at. 
>> 
>> I have just started an NTP client with just that server as a source.. The 
>> GPS based source is configured noselect.
>> 
>> Sat Jul 23 01:00:27 CEST 2016
>>    remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
>> ==============================================================================
>> 192.168.1.23    .GPS.            1 u   15   16  377    0.837   70.330  39.176
>> 128.138.140.50  .NIST.           1 u   12   16  377  130.662  -153.05  35.809
>> Sat Jul 23 01:01:31 CEST 2016
>>    remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
>> ==============================================================================
>> 192.168.1.23    .GPS.            1 u    7   16  377    0.825  106.345  40.264
>> 128.138.140.50  .NIST.           1 u   12   16  377  130.652  -121.03  35.812
>> 
>> The system clock offset is slowly converging on the UT1 server. 
>> 
>> more later.
>> 
>>> 
>>> Has there been thought to at least setting the reference ID to 'UT1'
>>> instead of 'NIST' (or maybe 'NUT1' since 'NIST-UT1' is too long?).
>>> 
>> I would prefer UT1
>>> 
>>> With respect to interpolation and soforth, it seems like a lot of NTP
>>> cares more about frequency than offset, and all this stepping presumably
>>> wreaks havoc with the frequency? Maybe I'm wrong though...
>>> 
>>> --jh...@mit.edu
>>> John Hawkinson
>>> 
>>> Tom Van Baak <t...@leapsecond.com> wrote on Fri, 22 Jul 2016
>>> at 15:14:26 -0700 in <60BA6696E49A4C4FA9F6B5792176F81A@pc52>:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>>    The current algorithm on the server uses the UT1 offset from
>>>>> Circular A with no interpolation. The value changes at 0 UTC every day.
>>>>> I did not use any interpolation because the difference in the dUT1
>>>>> value  from one day to the next is on the order of 1-2 ms, and I
>>>>> considered that it was likely that the jitter and asymmetry of the
>>>>> network connection to a typical user would limit the accuracy to a
>>>>> larger value anyway so that interpolation would not actually improve
>>>>> anything. However, I will certainly consider changing this. It would not
>>>>> be a big deal to add interpolation if there were some good reason for
>>>>> doing so.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Judah Levine
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to 
>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>> 
>> "The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who 
>> have not got it. »
>> George Bernard Shaw
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
> 
> "The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who 
> have not got it. »
> George Bernard Shaw
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to