Hi

At the most basic level, ADEV is a standard deviation. When people read an 
instrument they usually want a "max error" sort of number. ADEV operates on 
delta between readings so a simple "three sigma" mental math conversion is not 
all you need. It *is* the right measure. It can take a bit of work to convert 
it to useful units .

Bob


> On Aug 20, 2016, at 7:38 AM, Charles Steinmetz <csteinm...@yandex.com> wrote:
> 
> Bryan wrote:
> 
>> With a GPSDO as a general rule is there much variation of the 0.005 to 0.02 
>> ppb range. Would there me much if only 2 satellites were visible but the 
>> unit was no in holdover vs say 6 satellites. I assume there is probably a 
>> lot of variables such as quality of GPSDO and OCXO, multi path interference, 
>> antenna location, etc, but worse case what would a user expect assuming the 
>> unit isn't in holdover.
> 
> There are lots of ADEV plots of GPSDOs on the web, if you search for them.  
> Tom has the attached plot posted on his web site -- it includes one decent 
> (but not stellar) GPSDO, the HP Z3801.  That is about what you can expect 
> without heroic tuning efforts (on a GPSDO that supports user fiddling, such 
> as the Trimble Thunderbolt).
> 
> Since many counters gate for one second (or gate faster, then average), the 
> ADEV at tau=1 second is a reasonable estimate of the real-world performance 
> of a good counter driven by a GPSDO.  Note that, since the ADEV at 1 second 
> depends largely on the OCXO, the heroic tuning efforts mentioned above won't 
> change the ADEV at tau=1 second hardly at all. That is attributable strictly 
> to the OCXO (unless the GPSDO is very poorly designed).  Building a GPSDO 
> using the best OCXO available can improve things.  For example, look at the 
> "BVA" plot -- at 1 second, its ADEV is nearly a full decade better than the 
> Z3801, better even than the hydrogen masers.  (While I referred to the 3801 
> above as "decent but not stellar," that is based on its performance at tau 
> from 100-100k seconds.  Its OCXO -- and, thus, its ADEV -- is better than 
> most others at 1 second.)
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Charles
> 
> 
> <ADEV_plots_of_various_oscillators_TVB.gif>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to