Moin, I'm quoting the mail in full, because it seems to have not made it to the mailinglist due to its large attachment.
I uploaded the attachment to my server, you can find it here: http://time.kinali.ch/Metamaterial_and_MoebiusLoop.pdf On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:23:41 -0400 ka2...@aol.com wrote: > The noise result is connected with the duty cycle and the bias point (AF, > KF spice values ). We took the time to recalculate the Parzen and Frerking > examples and they do not give the best possible answer.We were able to > make the oscillators much better . > > If you look at the world leading Wenzel product line they got about 20 db > better in the last 10 years (less phase noise) as they replace these > published approximation with our correct mathematical solutions and better > test equipment. We are moving towards 100 Ghz and better phase noise. That's something that has been bothering me lately: Most of your publications are about the noise in UHF and GHz applications, hardly any for the area where most of time metrology happens: at 10MHz and 100MHz. Is this because the sub-100MHz range oscillators are a solved problem and hit the physical limits of what noise optimization can do? Or is it because there is more money to be made in the >100MHz range? Attila Kinali -- Malek's Law: Any simple idea will be worded in the most complicated way. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.