On 11/21/2016 1:10 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi With both counters running on the same external standard (and no internal OCXO), the 53230 beats the 53132 both on frequency and time. It also has slightly better isolation of the 10 MHz internals so the “dead zone” at 10 MHz is not quite as bad. I have no idea how either one works with the OCXO option … I’ve never seen either one with an OCXO. Bob
I remember when the 10 MHz section of the 53132 was designed. The designers had little knowledge of how to do that correctly. It wasn't their fault; it was the fault of the manager who assigned the task to them. Rick _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
