Pretty much every wifi transceiver is adc sampled so the frames are "timestamped", but the adc sample time may not get pushed up.
The rtt/tof for the large umbrella of localization applications, I would imagine will be impented even farther back in the rx chain. On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:42 AM jimlux <jim...@earthlink.net> wrote: > On 1/15/17 8:26 AM, Bob Camp wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > Ok, that’s a pretty good paper. At least it shows data and digs into the > details. > > > It also would lead one to believe that a “Time Nuts” grade sync system > might > > > be a hackable sort of thing …… hmmm…..Given how highly integrated these > > > WiFi chip sets have become, that probably is a fantasy. > > > > > > > maybe, maybe not.. > > > > They might have implemented the time stamping feature (like in that WiFi > > Arduino thing) but the details are poorly documented, and of course, > > everyone is different. > > > > But it's a start. > > > > and 802.11v appears to be the "standard" for how to do it in a > > "standards compliant" way. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
