Mohammad

The LTC6957-4 is inputs are intended to be AC coupled.

With  AC coupling a variable rate pulse will experience varying switching 
thresholds.

A constant fraction discriminator minimises timing walk when the pulse 
amplitude varies whilst the ristetime remains constant. 

If the pulse risetime also varies a more complex amplitude and risetime 
compensated discriminator is necessary to minimise timing walk.

For minimum timing jitter there will be an optimum zero crossing detector 
bandwidth.

Bruce

> 
>     On 26 March 2017 at 05:32 Mohammad-Hadi Sohrabi <mhsohr...@ucdavis.edu> 
> wrote:
> 
>     Hello,
>     I have been following the posts here for a while and learned alot. I
>     thought I could get some help as well.
>     I need to detect less than 20 ps between two incoming pulses from a
>     detector. pulses are 5ns wide and the rise time and fall time is around 
> 2ns
>     each.
>     I am planning to use a constant fraction discriminator, simply a fast
>     comparator with less than 500 MHz bandwidth for zero crossing detection 
> and
>     providing a very sharp edge. Then this can be fed into a TDC such as GPX2
>     or anything of this sort. I think these can be fairly easily implemented 
> on
>     FR4.
>     Recently I stumbled upon LTC6957-4 logic converter from another 
> discussion.
>     Can anyone guide me if this can be used for producing a sharp edge from a
>     pulse that I mentioned? Datasheet suggests 0.5 ns rise time is possible 
> but
>     I think this is for single tone sine wave and not a short pulse.
> 
>     Bests,
>     Mohammad
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>     To unsubscribe, go to 
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>     and follow the instructions there.
> 
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to