Jim Palfreyman writes:

> Consider a plot of a timing residual vs time. Say a watch against a maser,
> residual=watch-maser.

We usually don't use the word residual for this. When you compare a watch with 
a maser, or any DUT time against REF time, you get a quantity like: phase 
difference, or sometimes just "phase", or time difference, time error, time 
interval, time interval error, etc.

What residual usually refers to is if you post-process the raw time or 
frequency data in some way to better expose underlying structure. For example, 
if you remove a linear or quadratic fit from your phase data the resulting data 
set can be called phase residuals. This is done with free-running clocks 
because both frequency, and especially phase, diverge badly over time. So 
plotting residuals removes large systematic effects and exposes small effects 
of interest.


> Now if I now plot the cumulative sum (think integral) of the residual,
> that's going to give me an overall view of how the clock is performing over 
> time.

A traditional phase plot of residuals is itself "an overall view of how the 
clock is performing over time". That's why even before we make ADEV plots we 
want to see the phase (actually, phase difference) plot and maybe also the 
frequency (usually, normalized frequency) plot. Both give an overall view of 
how the clock is performing, not to mention the ADEV plot which even further 
summarizes clock performance.

A cumulative sum, an integral, of the timing residuals is a bit odd, but not 
wrong. This is the "area under the curve" of any residual phase plot. A 
traditional phase plot gives you a series of points on a line -- these tell you 
your clock error as a function of elapsed time. But plots are 2D, so your eye 
also senses the amount of area under the line -- this tells you not only how 
far off your clock is, but how long your clock has been how far off. The plot 
shows, and the eye recognizes both the line (how far) and the area (how far x 
how long).

> (If it helps, think of PID controllers and how they work in the "I" part.)

Yes, exactly. And the reason this is explicit in PID (or PIID) is that there is 
no human eye and no 2D plot. Therefore the PID algorithm has to manually 
compute the "area under the curve"; it has to calculate the cumulative sum as a 
scaler value. And it sounds like this single scaler value, as opposed to a 
rendered plot image, is what you're after.


> Now if you look at *motion* of an object over time, and you integrate its
> acceleration you get velocity, integrate again you get displacement.
> Integrate again and you get "absement" and again you get "abcity" (I only
> recently discovered these terms).

Ok, thanks for that word of the day! Full list here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absement#Higher_integrals

> Does the integral of a timing residual have a name, and does the integral
> of *that* have a name as well?

Nope. But let's make one up in honor of your time spent doing Pulsar work. Some 
sources suggest absement is a portmanteau of absent and displacement. Ok, could 
be, but just as likely ab- is a fine Latin prefix on its own, meaning away, 
depart. Think of abnormal, abhor, absent, abdicate, aberrant. Or the German 
abfahren, to depart from. (Ah, I finally got to put my Latin and German to use; 
or is that abuse).

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ab-
http://membean.com/wrotds/ab-away
https://www.vocabulary.com/lists/135086

Anyway, in the world of space / distance:

-4 abserk
-3 abseleration
-2 absity
-1 absement
 0 displacement
+1 velocity
+2 acceleration
+3 jerk

So how about for the world of time, we call integrated phase error: abtimer, or 
just abtime:

-1 abtime (integrated phase error, cumulative sum of time error, etc.) units: 
s^2
 0 time (phase, time error, phase difference, etc.) units: s
+1 frequency (rate of phase change, etc.) units: /s, Hz
+2 drift (linear frequency change) units: /s^2, Hz/s

I can imagine cases where abtime would be useful, especially for closed loops. 
Units are seconds^2, or second*days, etc. For example, it may come in handy 
when I post plots of the new WWVB receiver, or characterizing a sloppy GPSDO 
timing receiver.

/tvb

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to