Somewhat worse than an LTC6957 particularly at low offset frequencies. Either that or the manufacturers PN noise measurement method doesn't work well at low offsets.
Bruce > > On 04 March 2018 at 22:34 Leo Bodnar <l...@leobodnar.com> wrote: > > Ulf, > > What level of jitter would you consider acceptable? > > Try PL133-37, I am using it for sinewave shaping on some of designs - > including my 30ps pulser. > > Leo > > On 3 Mar 2018, at 21:56, time-nuts-requ...@febo.com wrote: > > > > > > From: Ulf Kylenfall <ulf_...@yahoo.com> > > > > Gentlemen, > > I have so far been using LT1016 as a pulse shaper and also whenever > > I needed toconvert a sine wave into TTL Logic levels. Some hysteresis and > > all the decouplingand layout precautions as recommended by LT. > > Are there any similar or better alternatives out there that could > > be usedthat would provide lower jitter and that are less expenceive? > > Ulf Kylenfall > > SM6GXV > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.