Hi The “drops stuff” problem is exactly what I saw trying to run at lower baud rates. The port is *not* full of data, there’s plenty of time to get it all out at a lower baud rate. For some reason (buffers maybe) these modules start dropping data *way* earlier than you would think they should.
Bob > On Apr 30, 2018, at 10:48 PM, Mark Sims <hol...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > I once spent way too much time trying to get Heather to spit out a RINEX file > from a Thunderbolt. I could never get any of the post-processors to accept > it. The Thunderbolt's raw data needs to somehow be tweaked to be compatible > and I didn't really know what I was doing. > > A LEA-6T seems to be able to cope with the data stream at it's default 9600 > baud. I just tried a NEO-8N and it drops packets, etc. Even weirder, it > does not output any of the requested packets that might be flooding the port, > but still drops packets. > > > ----------------------- > >> You mean that LH does not translate the data to the correct format *and* >> submit it for post processing ????? > > There *is* a lot of data when you turn all this stuff on. If you can get > above 115K baud, it’s well worth it. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
