Hi
> On May 21, 2018, at 1:44 PM, Gary E. Miller <g...@rellim.com> wrote: > > Yo Bob! > > On Mon, 21 May 2018 13:41:08 -0400 > Bob kb8tq <kb...@n1k.org> wrote: > >> Ok, are you trying to hold close to UTC or simply have a second that >> is as close to 1 second as possible? > > Yes. One follows the other. Not really, you can have a source of seconds that are all within 0.1 ns of the right length but are offset from UTC by 200 ns. ( stable but not accurate) You can have a series of seconds that are all within 10 ns of UTC, but one may be 20 ns to short and the next is 20 ns to long. ( accurate but not stable ) So, which of the two is more important? Bob > > RGDS > GARY > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 > g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 > > Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas? > "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
