Hi I’d say both have a “something” with a period of roughly 18 to 20 hours in their data runs.
Bob > On Jun 14, 2018, at 4:54 AM, Attila Kinali <att...@kinali.ch> wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 08:19:58 -0700 > <cdel...@juno.com> wrote: > >> Would be interesting to see a long plot of the two 5065 against each >> other! > > I had a look at Luciano's data and it's probably safe to say, that > the instability of the super-5065 would be the limit. The unmodified > 5065 is incredibly stable (once you remove drift). > > Attached are the two phase plots, both with quadratic drift removed. > The unmodified 5065A has a kind of weird ~18day undulation. I would > say it's an environmental effect, but the two cycles are too similar, > so I do not know what to think of it. > > The super-5065 (5065B) has quite a few bigger frequency jumps, with > pretty stable phases in-between. My guess here would be that there > are no environmental effects and it is limited by instabilities in > the frequency discriminator electronics, ie offsets that show (close to) > discrete jumps. or that the lamp brightness changes. > > Attila Kinali > > -- > It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All > the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no > use without that foundation. > -- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson > <HP5065Anr2 vs Z3816A 30days.png><HP5065Bnr1 vs Z3816A > 30days.png>_______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.