On Friday, May 31, 2019, 5:18:32 AM PDT, Bob kb8tq <kb...@n1k.org> wrote: Hi
One term you keep tossing up is “nominal phase coherence”. Typical GPS will do “phase coherence” at the 10 ns level to a fairly high degree of confidence (90 something percent) with a number of footnotes. You have never mentioned what your requirement is so it’s a bit tough to know what you are up against. If you are trying for “a couple of degrees at L band” from 0.1 second on out, GPS simply isn’t going to do that, no matter what you do. Bob Hi Bob, As you know, phase coherence has bandwidth and noise floor. If you looked at two VCOs phase-locked to a common 10MHz reference, they would be coherent within the bandwidth of the PLL down to the in-band noise floor pedestal. Beyond the bandwidth of the PLL they would not be coherent, and the in-band phase coherence would have a noise floor as defined by the PLL architecture and multiplied up reference noise. So I guess by nominal phase coherence I am trying to say that two GPSDO modules locked to the same GPS satellites (same physical location, probably even the same external antenna - and by antenna I mean that in the classic sense of the term, not GPS receiver) would exhibit phase coherence within a very small bandwidth. From what we've discussed this would be tiny fractions of a Hertz. I understand that a GPS timing signal does not have the greatest jitter/phase noise, which I think is what you meant by "10ns level to a fairly high degree of confidence". But we've also discussed that GPS would be best used to phase-lock a high-performance OCXO, where the PLL bandwidth is so low that the crossover point is where the OCXO ADEV far-out in time (1,000 sec?) is worse then the GPS. My goal would be, with such a correctly-implemented system, to accomplish phase coherence within the BW of the PLL, which admittedly might only be milliHertz. But if you displayed the 10MHz outputs of 2 modules on an oscilloscope (or ran them into a mixer or any other method of phase detection) they would be coherent. The phase noise at offsets greater than a few milliHertz would of course not be coherent (correlated), but that is not the requirement. I have other methods to implement wide-bandwidth phase coherence when that is needed. One other term I've seen referenced is "navigation" vs. "timing" GPS receivers, is this just the error/jitter in the PPS? TCXO vs. OCXO clocking the receiver? You said: "The TBolt simply takes out the need for a precision time measurement between the PPS and the OCXO. They can do that because they builtthe receiver from scratch." It would seem this is somewhat along the lines of what I want to do. Not necessarily build the RF receiver, but implement the code correction and digital PLL to arrive at results more in line with a "timing" than "navigation" receiver. Lifespeed _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com and follow the instructions there.
