The F9T and F9P - are these interchangeable for stationary timing use
and stationary high performance position ?
From how I read the datasheets, :
>>the F9P has an internal RTK engine, and the F9T outputs the info RTCM
etc and that data can be run on a external RTK engine on a micro.
The P provides 1.5m standalone positional accuracy compared to the T
standalone positional accuracy of 2.0m. Not much difference there..
>> the F9P and F9T have their timing pulse performance shown using
different description.
The P has this as "RMS and 99%", while the T has this as '5nS','2.5ns diff'
>>> Both can operate with companion receivers to enhance performance
but I interpret this as only the P can do a (internal, companion mode)
differential position fix and only the T can do a (internal companion
mode) differential time fix. That is , internally without using an
external engine.
***
So it seems, if using an external RTL etc engines, the devices can do
roughly the same thing.
How do others interpret this ? I want to do projects using positional
for one app, and timing for another, and would like to be able to
acheive the deep quantity discounts...
glen
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.
