Alright, I agree. The point is: do we ever need S1 NTPs? I think, this could be a nice addition if properly realized, but right now I'm not sure if I can propose it.
Anyway, going to plan moving these NTPs from the Cisco gear (where they didn't belong from the start, anyway). Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Monday, 22 July 2019 г., 22:01, Mike Cook <mike.c...@orange.fr> wrote: > . > > > All the certified GNSS disciplined clocks are really expensive (way more > > than the management would approve), so what I'm planning to do is possibly > > getting a couple LeoNTP units and using them as the root time sources, > > would this be a good plan? Of course, all the NTP infrastructure will be > > monitored, and possibly we'll use Stratum 2 servers which would be slaved to > > Your management needs educating. Your whole network architecture needs to be > analyzed . What happens if a S1 server goes away , what happens when a switch > dies , or a router……. > 2 clocks is a bad idea. 2 clocks from the same manufacturer is a worse idea. > If there is a FW issue in one it will get the other. > > > GPSDO S1's AND the public NTP pool for sanity checks. > > Maybe BG7TBL's units instead of LeoNTP? > > Is that a good idea? > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to > > http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com > > and follow the instructions there. > > « What’s the point? » > J.C. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com and follow the instructions there.
