Hi Bob,
I fully agree to your explanation. But I primarily want to see in the
compare e.g. the ADEV noise floor of the devices
with TimeLab or the different compared graphs for one OCXO measured with
the FA1, TSA3011.
If I am able to connect TimeLab with my FCA3103 in the future I also
want to compare this TIC with the
FA1 and TSA3011. Also important would be the fact whether the 'cheaper'
versions could be used to measure phase
noise as the TimePod 5330A or the PhaseStation 53100A devices and how
'low' they are going to do the job...
These facts would be a great help for time-nuts and hobbyists for a
buying decision where the measurement requirements
are not so high or a compromise to the technical circumstances of the
'measurements' they are doing.
The modern requirements of good lab equipment are not always the ability
to measure as exact as technical possible because
higher exactness of the measurement needs horrendous extra expenses for
little advantages.
Important requirements are what I think a good price/performance ratio
which allows also good technical measuring results without
the need to spent several thousands of euros/dollars for the equipment.
This is no longer impossible I think.
The power requirement is also a good point of the new lab devices...
I also wish to have a high level frequency and timing source as my lab
standard as a good caesium clock but I think
a Trimble Thunderbolt disciplining a good rubidium standard as the SRS
PRS10 surely does a good job and does not
consume a lot of power as a HP 5071A caesium source.
The 'cheap' TIC's as the FA1 and TSA3011 are little boxes which can be
connected to the usually available lab computer or tablet
is a great enhancement because expensive GPIB cables, cards or adapter
are no longer needed and the whole equipment will be
more portable.
For my point of view these facts are very important and the reallocated
space in the lab can can be used for other things :)
(Sorry for the longer post)
best regards
Chris
---
'Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.' -- Albert
Einstein
Am 04.09.2019 um 19:09 schrieb Bob kb8tq:
Hi
Assuming Mark’s data is at 10 MHz and 1 second then 0.0002 Hz is 20 ppt. That
number
can be compared directly against data presented for a variety of other devices.
By far the
best way to do the comparison would be to take data over a range of tau’s and
look at the
resulting plot. That way you can be reasonably sure that there isn’t something
weird going on
at one or another tau.
Bob
On Sep 4, 2019, at 1:07 AM, Christoph Kopetzky <c...@cksd.de> wrote:
This would be an interesting compare.
I want to compare the FA1 and the TSA3011 if I am back in office and have both
in my hands...
But I really do not want to buy unnecessary tools... So if someone has done
this it would be nice to read about that.
Mark, do you have also a TICC?
best regards
Chris
---
'Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.' -- Albert
Einstein
Am 03.09.2019 um 21:21 schrieb Jerry Hancock:
How would this compare to the TAPR TICC Rev D? The one that has the arduino
base? About half the price I see.
Regards,
Jerry
On Sep 2, 2019, at 5:50 AM, Christoph Kopetzky <c...@cksd.de
<mailto:c...@cksd.de>> wrote:
Hi Mark,
interesting post.
So is the FA1 compatible with the TimeLab or Stable32 software?
And could I do phase noise measurements with it like the TimePod?
Chris
Am 30.08.2019 um 22:57 schrieb Mark Sims:
(Hopefully this is not a duplicate post... hotmail has been having issues)
The FA1 is a small, USB powered frequency counter. You supply it with a 10
MHz reference and an input frequency of 1 .. 80 MHz. It outputs a text string
of the measured frequency every second. They cost around $80 .. $120.
Apparently there is a PLL inside... the text string has a "PLL unlock" flag.
There is no info on how it works and I have not opened mine up.
I did a simple noise test on one where the input and ref clocks were from a
Tbolt. It looks like the measurement noise is around +/- 0.0002 Hz.
Lady Heather can now read it. Attached is a screen capture of the noise test.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
<mailto:time-nuts@lists.febo.com>
To unsubscribe, go to
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
<mailto:time-nuts@lists.febo.com>
To unsubscribe, go to
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.
