On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 08:15:30 +0000
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <p...@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> In one of his lectures Feynmann mentions that the energy levels of
> hydrogen have been calculated to 15 or 16 digits "from first
> principles".
>
> As far as I can figure out, that must have happened in the 1970'ies,
> which means it was probably done on one of Seymour Cray's designs.
>
> Hydrogen is obviously "the easy one", but even if the calculation
> scales to the power of four on the number of particles in the atom,
> we should still be well inside current super-computing capacities.
>
> Do you know if anybody has considered that as way to nail the frequencies ?
The Hydrogen atom is much easier to calculate than any of the
Hydrogen-like atoms that we use for atomic clocks these days.
As far as I am aware of, the complexity of doing a full from
first principles calculation of even Ca+ is beyond what current
computers can do. So people are still using approximations to
calculate the energy levels for these. Sorry, I can't point you
at papers at the moment. I know I have them somewhere on my
harddrive, but I cannot figure out where I put them.
Attila Kinali
--
The driving force behind research is the question: "Why?"
There are things we don't understand and things we always
wonder about. And that's why we do research.
-- Kobayashi Makoto
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an
email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
