Hi

I think that if you are looking at something this size, a compressor based heat 
/ cool setup
will do much better than a solid state approach. Way less power due to the much 
better 
efficiency . You can get pretty small systems that will hold < 0.05 C on the 
“coolant line".

Bob

> On Sep 10, 2021, at 5:03 PM, Jerome Blaha <jbl...@polariswireless.com> wrote:
> 
> Would the use of a partial vacuum in a sealed chamber or even the septic tank 
> to reach a somewhat steady-state temperature be out of the question, as only 
> radiation would dominate the temperature?
> 
> Bill's idea of a 0C water bath also sounds kind of cool and perhaps it might 
> be attainable with a double or triple stacked pettier cooler (reversible in 
> voltage if your outdoor temps get below 0C) with very small tubing with 
> coolant and two tiny DC powered pumps for redundancy with check valves to a 
> small radiator inside the crypt water/ice bath with an RTD temperature 
> sensor.  Throw in an above-ground solar and battery backup, and the 
> solid-state refrigeration unit could be fully self-contained and located far 
> enough from the time crypt to not influence gravity, magnetism, quantum 
> physics, etc.
> 
> -Jerome Blaha Jr 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: time-nuts-requ...@lists.febo.com 
> [mailto:time-nuts-requ...@lists.febo.com] 
> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 12:30 AM
> To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> Subject: time-nuts Digest, Vol 209, Issue 7
> 
> Send time-nuts mailing list submissions to
>       time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or
> body 'help' to
>       time-nuts-requ...@lists.febo.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       time-nuts-ow...@lists.febo.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of time-nuts digest..."
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: in-ground clock room (B Riches)
>   2. Re: in-ground clock room (Dana Whitlow)
>   3. Re: in-ground clock room (Andy Gardner, ZL3AG)
>   4. Re: in-ground clock room (Dana Whitlow)
>   5. Re: in-ground clock room (Bob kb8tq)
>   6. Re: in-ground clock room (Brent)
>   7. Re: in-ground clock room (Joseph Gwinn)
>   8. Re: in-ground clock room (Steve Allen)
>   9. Re: in-ground clock room (Scott McGrath)
>  10. Re: in-ground clock room (Dana Whitlow)
>  11. Re: in-ground clock room (Gilles Clement)
>  12. Re: in-ground clock room (John Marvin)
>  13. Re: [time nuts] Re: in-ground clock room (Bill Beam)
>  14. Re: in-ground clock room (Lux, Jim)
>  15. Re: in-ground clock room (Graham / KE9H)
>  16. Re: in-ground clock room (Ben Bradley)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 11:17:02 +0000 (UTC)
> From: B Riches <bill.ric...@verizon.net>
> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: in-ground clock room
> To:     Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>       <time-nuts@lists.febo.com>,        Tom Van Baak <t...@leapsecond.com>
> Message-ID: <376021411.3362644.1631186222...@mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> How about using a round septic tank.  Mine is about 5 feet wide and 6 feet 
> deep  Large hole in the top - put ladder for entry.
> 73, 
> Bill, WA2DVUCape May, NJ
>    On Thursday, September 9, 2021, 02:29:40 AM EDT, Bill Beam <wb...@gci.net> 
> wrote:  
> 
> On Wed, 08 Sep 2021 18:36:11 -0800, Bill Beam wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 18:54:03 -0700, Tom Van Baak wrote:
> 
>>> I am considering a below ground "clock room" away from the house. This 
>>> will be for some low-drift quartz oscillators and also a couple of 
>>> precision pendulum clocks. The goal is long-term, unattended, and very 
>>> undisturbed operation.
> 
>>> For scale, assume the room is 1 meter +— 1 meter +— 2 meters deep. So 
>>> that's vastly smaller than digging a basement, but much larger than 
>>> drilling a 8 inch round pipe. Digging down gives some natural isolation 
>>> and temperature regulation. A couple tons of concrete gives high 
>>> stability vertical walls for the pendulum clocks.
> 
>>> If any of you have personal or professional experience with the design 
>>> or construction of this sort of thing, especially experience with 
>>> precast (utility) vaults or poured concrete, please let me know.
> 
>>> In case this gets too off-topic for time-nuts, off-list email to me is 
>>> fine (t...@leapsecond.com).
> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> /tvb
> 
>> Tom,
> 
>> How long do you expect your proposed voult to go undisturbed?
>> I have several pendulum clocks.  They are disturbed every couple of months
>> by earth quakes.  By disturbed, I mean pendulum banging against the case 
>> walls....
>> Any ground motion that can be felt will upset the clocks.  Often the clocks 
>> will
>> signal an earth quake that is not felt.
> 
>> Good luck.
> 
> I spent a few years as a geotechnic/soils engineer and learned as others have 
> pointed out
> that a thermal wave of period one year and wave length of several meters 
> propagates
> downward thru the soil.  Peak amplitude of a few degrees can be expected near 
> the surface.
> 
> Consider building an "oven" with the clock vault freely floating in a 
> water-ice mixture.  This will
> provide constant temperature (0C) and limited mechanical isolation from earth 
> quakes.
> 
> But of course this will be expensive to operate.
> 
> As you know 'good' clocks require a lot of energy and generate a lot of 
> entropy.
> 
> Protecting the quartz oscillators is much easier than protecting the pendulum 
> clocks.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Bill Beam
> NL7F
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an 
> email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.  
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 07:09:33 -0500
> From: Dana Whitlow <k8yumdoo...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: in-ground clock room
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>       <time-nuts@lists.febo.com>
> Message-ID:
>       <cadhrwpfdjccbgnwncxsssngipix9nfckxd5f3hjjs3eivaq...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> 
> It seems to me that in order to derive much thermal stabilization, the *top*
> of the space would need to be several feet underground (depending on
> geographic location).  And I think that the means for human access would
> likely "spoil the broth" unless fairly extreme measures were taken.
> 
> Wouldn't it be sufficient to use a space whose thermal coupling were weak
> enough to make the time constant a few days (instead of months)?  Then,
> ordinary inexpensive means like GPS-locked Rb standards with suitable
> (longish) time constants should clean up "GPS noise", yet enable the loop
> to take care of low rate temperature variations in the protected space due
> to outside temperature changes.
> 
> Remember, perfection in clocks is expensive- according to recent things I've
> read about entropy of timekeeping, a perfect clock would require infinite
> power,
> and that alone would blow away all one's efforts at temperature control.
> 
> Dana
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 6:19 AM B Riches via time-nuts <
> time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote:
> 
>> How about using a round septic tank.  Mine is about 5 feet wide and 6
>> feet deep  Large hole in the top - put ladder for entry.
>> 73,
>> Bill, WA2DVUCape May, NJ
>>    On Thursday, September 9, 2021, 02:29:40 AM EDT, Bill Beam <
>> wb...@gci.net> wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, 08 Sep 2021 18:36:11 -0800, Bill Beam wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 18:54:03 -0700, Tom Van Baak wrote:
>> 
>>>> I am considering a below ground "clock room" away from the house. This
>>>> will be for some low-drift quartz oscillators and also a couple of
>>>> precision pendulum clocks. The goal is long-term, unattended, and very
>>>> undisturbed operation.
>> 
>>>> For scale, assume the room is 1 meter +— 1 meter +— 2 meters deep. So
>>>> that's vastly smaller than digging a basement, but much larger than
>>>> drilling a 8 inch round pipe. Digging down gives some natural isolation
>>>> and temperature regulation. A couple tons of concrete gives high
>>>> stability vertical walls for the pendulum clocks.
>> 
>>>> If any of you have personal or professional experience with the design
>>>> or construction of this sort of thing, especially experience with
>>>> precast (utility) vaults or poured concrete, please let me know.
>> 
>>>> In case this gets too off-topic for time-nuts, off-list email to me is
>>>> fine (t...@leapsecond.com).
>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> /tvb
>> 
>>> Tom,
>> 
>>> How long do you expect your proposed voult to go undisturbed?
>>> I have several pendulum clocks.  They are disturbed every couple of months
>>> by earth quakes.  By disturbed, I mean pendulum banging against the case
>> walls....
>>> Any ground motion that can be felt will upset the clocks.  Often the
>> clocks will
>>> signal an earth quake that is not felt.
>> 
>>> Good luck.
>> 
>> I spent a few years as a geotechnic/soils engineer and learned as others
>> have pointed out
>> that a thermal wave of period one year and wave length of several meters
>> propagates
>> downward thru the soil.  Peak amplitude of a few degrees can be expected
>> near the surface.
>> 
>> Consider building an "oven" with the clock vault freely floating in a
>> water-ice mixture.  This will
>> provide constant temperature (0C) and limited mechanical isolation from
>> earth quakes.
>> 
>> But of course this will be expensive to operate.
>> 
>> As you know 'good' clocks require a lot of energy and generate a lot of
>> entropy.
>> 
>> Protecting the quartz oscillators is much easier than protecting the
>> pendulum clocks.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Bill Beam
>> NL7F
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send
>> an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send
>> an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 00:29:15 +1200
> From: "Andy Gardner, ZL3AG" <zl...@radioengineering.com>
> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: in-ground clock room
> To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> Message-ID:
>       <0615ccea-ea7e-a4e3-7c19-8767c37d2...@radioengineering.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
> 
> 
> So the 2 things you're after are thermal insulation and vibration insulation?
> 
> Digging can be expensive, and you have to worry about water table in many 
> locations.
> 
> How about the thickest concrete water tank you can find, plonk it in a nice 
> location, spray layers of polyurethane foam over the top and sides for 
> thermal insulation, then build a wind shield ("shed") around it. The shed 
> could be an old coolstore, adding more insulation.
> 
> Concrete water tanks are out of fashion these days due to plastics, so if you 
> shop around you can find a cheap used one, and then it's just the 
> trucking/crane charges.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 07:38:30 -0500
> From: Dana Whitlow <k8yumdoo...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: in-ground clock room
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>       <time-nuts@lists.febo.com>
> Message-ID:
>       <CADHrwpdUZSteVrKK_PKfbsCYcJX311TAj7=tbq7nayofopu...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> 
> Tom,
> 
> Andy brings up good points, especially about water leaks.
> Are you familiar with "Whitlow's 5th law" (which can be summarized
> as "everything leaks")?
> 
> Dana Whitlow
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 7:29 AM Andy Gardner, ZL3AG via time-nuts <
> time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> So the 2 things you're after are thermal insulation and vibration
>> insulation?
>> 
>> Digging can be expensive, and you have to worry about water table in many
>> locations.
>> 
>> How about the thickest concrete water tank you can find, plonk it in a
>> nice location, spray layers of polyurethane foam over the top and sides for
>> thermal insulation, then build a wind shield ("shed") around it. The shed
>> could be an old coolstore, adding more insulation.
>> 
>> Concrete water tanks are out of fashion these days due to plastics, so if
>> you shop around you can find a cheap used one, and then it's just the
>> trucking/crane charges.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send
>> an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
>> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 09:04:04 -0400
> From: Bob kb8tq <kb...@n1k.org>
> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: in-ground clock room
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>       <time-nuts@lists.febo.com>
> Cc: Tom Van Baak <t...@leapsecond.com>
> Message-ID: <e624e63e-7bcd-49e8-9af5-ff9c7c32e...@n1k.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=utf-8
> 
> Hi
> 
> You could do some research on the climate in various parts of the world.
> Pick the ideal location and move there :) :) You also could optimize the
> location for various tidal forces ….  
> 
> How deep can you go on your property before you run into something
> massive? Around here, I can go down between a foot and maybe two
> feet. At that point it’s time for dynamite. You do not ask “how much to
> put in a swimming pool?” in this neighborhood.  Part of this is the geology,
> part is how the builder graded things to  put in the subdivision. 
> 
> While that *sounds* ideal, the shale is tilted due to some thing running into
> something else a while ago. The net result is ground water running here 
> and there to some fairly significant depths. As the seasons change that
> ground water and its somewhat random route changes isn’t ideal for 
> temperature stability. 
> 
> Yes, it’s all about some *very* local aspects of your geology.  With some 
> care, I could move a few miles in one direction or another and be in a *very* 
> different situation. (again thanks to just how this ran into that ….).  
> 
> Since temperature stability is only part of the design and mechanical 
> stability is the other. This location might work ok for half of the design 
> goals …. Granite likely would do better than fractured shale though ...
> 
> Bob
> 
>> On Sep 9, 2021, at 1:20 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <p...@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
>> 
>> --------
>> Tom Van Baak writes:
>> 
>>> For scale, assume the room is 1 meter × 1 meter × 2 meters deep. So 
>>> that's vastly smaller than digging a basement, but much larger than 
>>> drilling a 8 inch round pipe. Digging down gives some natural isolation 
>>> and temperature regulation. A couple tons of concrete gives high 
>>> stability vertical walls for the pendulum clocks.
>> 
>> I researched this extensively before we built a house 5 years ago.
>> 
>> Look at the plot on page 37 in this paper:
>> 
>>      
>> https://url.emailprotection.link/?bUQcqOjURXhTPB6JfDc92MEONol3xTSgYvfeJ8BbiBWRjdyPVNx0zkKcKHTkrvxHEUgotv-qebTvJWhqYNQ7vZ5PmnBkg4k4h3etdOL-lB35s4BUytlJhLgWSYHxkU2mT3qsp3DRrx7JvchbPB-BTzWEvV1ZErfgyCy4iwT8fE2oN0ulm9DaMsjEqQThbX3q7ylNve8Qz8EIqdBClbB4zPA~~
>> 
>> It shows that in Denmark the yearly temperature variations in
>> penetrates to a depth of 15 meters, and that even at 10 meters
>> depth, you can expect the swing to be several Kelvin in any year.
>> 
>> I did find handwaving which said tree-cover reduced the swing by
>> "a lot" but no measurements to substantiate it.
>> 
>> In the end I concluded that I could do better in the comfort of my lab.
>> 
>> You should try to find similar data for your local climate and
>> geology, before you pour too much money into a hole in the ground.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
>> p...@freebsd.org         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
>> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
>> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an 
>> email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 10:12:06 -0400
> From: Brent <brent.ev...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: in-ground clock room
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>       <time-nuts@lists.febo.com>
> Message-ID:
>       <CAP6i9Mni5LDGDaanNB5QP=shtyerlqurbknu7ivo6chaxas...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> 
> Seismic vaults are built similar to your requirements.  I suggest looking
> up the Earthscope program - there should be info out on the web as to how
> their vaults were designed, but in a nutshell, dig a hole, put some gravel
> in the bottom, place a large culvert on end in the hole, pour a few inches
> of concrete in the culvert, put instrumentation in a pedestal inside, run
> power and comms, put a bilge pump and outflow pipe in it on the floor
> (below pedastal), and put a cap on the whole thing.  Those were then
> re-buried, but that prevents easy access (although it probably improves
> temperature stability). A septic tank would be larger, but more effort, and
> may expose more surface area to the sun (temp variation).
> 
> I've been in various seismic vaults and they can vary from very extravagant
> to downright crude.
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 9:04 AM Bob kb8tq <kb...@n1k.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> You could do some research on the climate in various parts of the world.
>> Pick the ideal location and move there :) :) You also could optimize the
>> location for various tidal forces ….
>> 
>> How deep can you go on your property before you run into something
>> massive? Around here, I can go down between a foot and maybe two
>> feet. At that point it’s time for dynamite. You do not ask “how much to
>> put in a swimming pool?” in this neighborhood.  Part of this is the
>> geology,
>> part is how the builder graded things to  put in the subdivision.
>> 
>> While that *sounds* ideal, the shale is tilted due to some thing running
>> into
>> something else a while ago. The net result is ground water running here
>> and there to some fairly significant depths. As the seasons change that
>> ground water and its somewhat random route changes isn’t ideal for
>> temperature stability.
>> 
>> Yes, it’s all about some *very* local aspects of your geology.  With some
>> care, I could move a few miles in one direction or another and be in a
>> *very*
>> different situation. (again thanks to just how this ran into that ….).
>> 
>> Since temperature stability is only part of the design and mechanical
>> stability is the other. This location might work ok for half of the design
>> goals …. Granite likely would do better than fractured shale though ...
>> 
>> Bob
>> 
>>> On Sep 9, 2021, at 1:20 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <p...@phk.freebsd.dk>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> --------
>>> Tom Van Baak writes:
>>> 
>>>> For scale, assume the room is 1 meter × 1 meter × 2 meters deep. So
>>>> that's vastly smaller than digging a basement, but much larger than
>>>> drilling a 8 inch round pipe. Digging down gives some natural isolation
>>>> and temperature regulation. A couple tons of concrete gives high
>>>> stability vertical walls for the pendulum clocks.
>>> 
>>> I researched this extensively before we built a house 5 years ago.
>>> 
>>> Look at the plot on page 37 in this paper:
>>> 
>>> 
>> https://url.emailprotection.link/?bUQcqOjURXhTPB6JfDc92MEONol3xTSgYvfeJ8BbiBWRjdyPVNx0zkKcKHTkrvxHEUgotv-qebTvJWhqYNQ7vZ5PmnBkg4k4h3etdOL-lB35s4BUytlJhLgWSYHxkU2mT3qsp3DRrx7JvchbPB-BTzWEvV1ZErfgyCy4iwT8fE2oN0ulm9DaMsjEqQThbX3q7ylNve8Qz8EIqdBClbB4zPA~~
>>> 
>>> It shows that in Denmark the yearly temperature variations in
>>> penetrates to a depth of 15 meters, and that even at 10 meters
>>> depth, you can expect the swing to be several Kelvin in any year.
>>> 
>>> I did find handwaving which said tree-cover reduced the swing by
>>> "a lot" but no measurements to substantiate it.
>>> 
>>> In the end I concluded that I could do better in the comfort of my lab.
>>> 
>>> You should try to find similar data for your local climate and
>>> geology, before you pour too much money into a hole in the ground.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
>>> p...@freebsd.org         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
>>> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
>>> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by
>> incompetence.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe
>> send an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send
>> an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 12:02:44 -0400
> From: Joseph Gwinn <joegw...@comcast.net>
> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: in-ground clock room
> To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> Message-ID: <20210909120244341063.4dfa1...@comcast.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> On Thu, 09 Sep 2021 03:30:35 -0400, time-nuts-requ...@lists.febo.com 
> wrote:
> Re: time-nuts Digest, Vol 209, Issue 6
> 
> 
>> ------------------------------
>>> Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 18:54:03 -0700
>> From: Tom Van Baak <t...@leapsecond.com>
>> Subject: [time-nuts] in-ground clock room
>> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>>      <time-nuts@lists.febo.com>
>> Message-ID: <4037f6cb-ade3-8c01-8c36-7edf19327...@leapsecond.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>> 
>> I am considering a below ground "clock room" away from the house. This 
>> will be for some low-drift quartz oscillators and also a couple of 
>> precision pendulum clocks. The goal is long-term, unattended, and very 
>> undisturbed operation.
>> 
>> For scale, assume the room is 1 meter × 1 meter × 2 meters deep. So 
>> that's vastly smaller than digging a basement, but much larger than 
>> drilling a 8 inch round pipe. Digging down gives some natural isolation 
>> and temperature regulation. A couple tons of concrete gives high 
>> stability vertical walls for the pendulum clocks.
>> 
>> If any of you have personal or professional experience with the design 
>> or construction of this sort of thing, especially experience with 
>> precast (utility) vaults or poured concrete, please let me know.
>> 
>> In case this gets too off-topic for time-nuts, off-list email to me is 
>> fine (t...@leapsecond.com).
> 
> As others have said, it may not be economically practical to build an 
> underground clock room.
> 
> Assuming that you have a basement of other suitable room in your 
> house, I'd suggest an insulated box or room containing a big lump of 
> iron riding on an inner-tube suspension of some kind.   The big lump 
> of iron can be a 500-pound truck engine head or block from a 
> junkyard, steam cleaned (to remove oil) and painted (to keep the rust 
> under control).  Drill and tap holes as needed for mounting.
> 
> This box/room plus block can be set up as a temperature-controlled 
> oven with a few extra components, including a PID controller.
> 
> Bolt a thick plywood floor to the top of the iron hunk, and attach 
> the clocks to this floor.
> 
> Joe Gwinn
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 8
> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 09:13:18 -0700
> From: Steve Allen <s...@ucolick.org>
> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: in-ground clock room
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>       <time-nuts@lists.febo.com>
> Message-ID: <20210909161318.ga19...@ucolick.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> 
> On Wed 2021-09-08T18:54:03-0700 Tom Van Baak hath writ:
>> I am considering a below ground "clock room" away from the house. This will
>> be for some low-drift quartz oscillators and also a couple of precision
>> pendulum clocks. The goal is long-term, unattended, and very undisturbed
>> operation.
> 
> How deep?
> 
> Bulletin Horaire v3n46p262 (1929-02-10) reports the equipment,
> facilities, and operations of Bureau International de l'Heure at
> Observatoire de Paris.
> 
> The highest precision pendulum clocks, the ones which had mechanisms
> to correct for temperature and pressure (the "garde-temps") were kept
> 27 m below ground in caves and galleries which were part of the
> Paris catacombs.
> 
> Various issues of Bulletin Horaire report discontinuities in the
> operation of those clocks due to distant earthquakes.
> 
> --
> Steve Allen                    <s...@ucolick.org>              WGS-84 (GPS)
> UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB 260  Natural Sciences II, Room 165  Lat  +36.99855
> 1156 High Street               Voice: +1 831 459 3046         Lng -122.06015
> Santa Cruz, CA 95064           
> https://url.emailprotection.link/?babImg0bEUxMHpPsxOmCp3Cn-KMvw54w86vJHHj3bTiz-n20wRlflI_23_p5IjE256VI1iFbNSdl2v6Rv0dqwQw~~
>   Hgt +250 m
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 9
> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 12:28:00 -0400
> From: Scott McGrath <scmcgr...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: in-ground clock room
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>       <time-nuts@lists.febo.com>
> Message-ID: <0595152c-c512-45d9-8903-f2616d349...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> 
> 
> Rather than custom casting a structure you might want to consider use of a 
> precast concrete septic tank or transformer vault as cost will be much lower.
> 
> You will also need to consider waterproofing the tank it already has a layer 
> of waterproofing but a couple of additional layers will probably be necessary 
> as well as ensuring proper drainage around it as it will need to be both 
> above local water table and be able to drain off percolating rainwater. 
> 
> You will also need to control temperature and humidity 
> 
> On Sep 9, 2021, at 12:03 PM, Joseph Gwinn <joegw...@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 09 Sep 2021 03:30:35 -0400, time-nuts-requ...@lists.febo.com 
> wrote:
> Re: time-nuts Digest, Vol 209, Issue 6
> 
> 
>> ------------------------------
>>> Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 18:54:03 -0700
>> From: Tom Van Baak <t...@leapsecond.com>
>> Subject: [time-nuts] in-ground clock room
>> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>>   <time-nuts@lists.febo.com>
>> Message-ID: <4037f6cb-ade3-8c01-8c36-7edf19327...@leapsecond.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>> 
>> I am considering a below ground "clock room" away from the house. This 
>> will be for some low-drift quartz oscillators and also a couple of 
>> precision pendulum clocks. The goal is long-term, unattended, and very 
>> undisturbed operation.
>> 
>> For scale, assume the room is 1 meter × 1 meter × 2 meters deep. So 
>> that's vastly smaller than digging a basement, but much larger than 
>> drilling a 8 inch round pipe. Digging down gives some natural isolation 
>> and temperature regulation. A couple tons of concrete gives high 
>> stability vertical walls for the pendulum clocks.
>> 
>> If any of you have personal or professional experience with the design 
>> or construction of this sort of thing, especially experience with 
>> precast (utility) vaults or poured concrete, please let me know.
>> 
>> In case this gets too off-topic for time-nuts, off-list email to me is 
>> fine (t...@leapsecond.com).
> 
> As others have said, it may not be economically practical to build an 
> underground clock room.
> 
> Assuming that you have a basement of other suitable room in your 
> house, I'd suggest an insulated box or room containing a big lump of 
> iron riding on an inner-tube suspension of some kind.   The big lump 
> of iron can be a 500-pound truck engine head or block from a 
> junkyard, steam cleaned (to remove oil) and painted (to keep the rust 
> under control).  Drill and tap holes as needed for mounting.
> 
> This box/room plus block can be set up as a temperature-controlled 
> oven with a few extra components, including a PID controller.
> 
> Bolt a thick plywood floor to the top of the iron hunk, and attach 
> the clocks to this floor.
> 
> Joe Gwinn
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an 
> email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 10
> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 11:35:30 -0500
> From: Dana Whitlow <k8yumdoo...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: in-ground clock room
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>       <time-nuts@lists.febo.com>
> Message-ID:
>       <cadhrwpffwgtpax+s02yfnex704rp_5rwgxheffjab+alf8i...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> 
> One might also consider mounting smaller items inside the cylinders of the
> engine block,
> to get the most out of its thermal mass.
> 
> Dana
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 11:03 AM Joseph Gwinn <joegw...@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 09 Sep 2021 03:30:35 -0400, time-nuts-requ...@lists.febo.com
>> wrote:
>> Re: time-nuts Digest, Vol 209, Issue 6
>> 
>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 18:54:03 -0700
>>> From: Tom Van Baak <t...@leapsecond.com>
>>> Subject: [time-nuts] in-ground clock room
>>> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>>>      <time-nuts@lists.febo.com>
>>> Message-ID: <4037f6cb-ade3-8c01-8c36-7edf19327...@leapsecond.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>>> 
>>> I am considering a below ground "clock room" away from the house. This
>>> will be for some low-drift quartz oscillators and also a couple of
>>> precision pendulum clocks. The goal is long-term, unattended, and very
>>> undisturbed operation.
>>> 
>>> For scale, assume the room is 1 meter × 1 meter × 2 meters deep. So
>>> that's vastly smaller than digging a basement, but much larger than
>>> drilling a 8 inch round pipe. Digging down gives some natural isolation
>>> and temperature regulation. A couple tons of concrete gives high
>>> stability vertical walls for the pendulum clocks.
>>> 
>>> If any of you have personal or professional experience with the design
>>> or construction of this sort of thing, especially experience with
>>> precast (utility) vaults or poured concrete, please let me know.
>>> 
>>> In case this gets too off-topic for time-nuts, off-list email to me is
>>> fine (t...@leapsecond.com).
>> 
>> As others have said, it may not be economically practical to build an
>> underground clock room.
>> 
>> Assuming that you have a basement of other suitable room in your
>> house, I'd suggest an insulated box or room containing a big lump of
>> iron riding on an inner-tube suspension of some kind.   The big lump
>> of iron can be a 500-pound truck engine head or block from a
>> junkyard, steam cleaned (to remove oil) and painted (to keep the rust
>> under control).  Drill and tap holes as needed for mounting.
>> 
>> This box/room plus block can be set up as a temperature-controlled
>> oven with a few extra components, including a PID controller.
>> 
>> Bolt a thick plywood floor to the top of the iron hunk, and attach
>> the clocks to this floor.
>> 
>> Joe Gwinn
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send
>> an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
>> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 11
> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 21:05:11 +0200
> From: Gilles Clement <clemg...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: in-ground clock room
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>       <time-nuts@lists.febo.com>
> Message-ID: <c3b65d1e-3eb2-42f0-8291-46eba92dd...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=utf-8
> 
> With a slight cantilevered cavity at the base, 
> instrumental as a *nut cracker… o:))
> * = time?
> 
>> Le 9 sept. 2021 à 18:35, Dana Whitlow <k8yumdoo...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>> 
>> One might also consider mounting smaller items inside the cylinders of the
>> engine block,
>> to get the most out of its thermal mass.
>> 
>> Dana
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 11:03 AM Joseph Gwinn <joegw...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Thu, 09 Sep 2021 03:30:35 -0400, time-nuts-requ...@lists.febo.com
>>> wrote:
>>> Re: time-nuts Digest, Vol 209, Issue 6
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 18:54:03 -0700
>>>> From: Tom Van Baak <t...@leapsecond.com>
>>>> Subject: [time-nuts] in-ground clock room
>>>> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>>>>     <time-nuts@lists.febo.com>
>>>> Message-ID: <4037f6cb-ade3-8c01-8c36-7edf19327...@leapsecond.com>
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>>>> 
>>>> I am considering a below ground "clock room" away from the house. This
>>>> will be for some low-drift quartz oscillators and also a couple of
>>>> precision pendulum clocks. The goal is long-term, unattended, and very
>>>> undisturbed operation.
>>>> 
>>>> For scale, assume the room is 1 meter × 1 meter × 2 meters deep. So
>>>> that's vastly smaller than digging a basement, but much larger than
>>>> drilling a 8 inch round pipe. Digging down gives some natural isolation
>>>> and temperature regulation. A couple tons of concrete gives high
>>>> stability vertical walls for the pendulum clocks.
>>>> 
>>>> If any of you have personal or professional experience with the design
>>>> or construction of this sort of thing, especially experience with
>>>> precast (utility) vaults or poured concrete, please let me know.
>>>> 
>>>> In case this gets too off-topic for time-nuts, off-list email to me is
>>>> fine (t...@leapsecond.com).
>>> 
>>> As others have said, it may not be economically practical to build an
>>> underground clock room.
>>> 
>>> Assuming that you have a basement of other suitable room in your
>>> house, I'd suggest an insulated box or room containing a big lump of
>>> iron riding on an inner-tube suspension of some kind.   The big lump
>>> of iron can be a 500-pound truck engine head or block from a
>>> junkyard, steam cleaned (to remove oil) and painted (to keep the rust
>>> under control).  Drill and tap holes as needed for mounting.
>>> 
>>> This box/room plus block can be set up as a temperature-controlled
>>> oven with a few extra components, including a PID controller.
>>> 
>>> Bolt a thick plywood floor to the top of the iron hunk, and attach
>>> the clocks to this floor.
>>> 
>>> Joe Gwinn
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send
>>> an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an 
>> email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 12
> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 13:57:44 -0600
> From: John Marvin <jm-t...@themarvins.org>
> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: in-ground clock room
> To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> Message-ID: <7c02f7ff-8cd7-e2b2-88af-16f6ee138...@themarvins.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
> Hmm, this list isn't called time-science, time-research, time-hardware, 
> or time-trivia. It's called time-nuts.  This is probably one of the most 
> on topic (and fun) posts I've seen on this list. :)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> John
> 
> On 9/8/2021 7:54 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote:
>> 
>> In case this gets too off-topic for time-nuts, off-list email to me is 
>> fine (t...@leapsecond.com).
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> /tvb
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe 
>> send an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 13
> Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 13:57:30 -0800
> From: "Bill Beam" <wb...@gci.net>
> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: [time nuts] Re: in-ground clock room
> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
>       <time-nuts@lists.febo.com>
> Message-ID: <05.1f.05200.1538a...@smtp02.beryl.bos.sync.lan>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> --Original Message Text---
> From: Tom Van Baak
> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 04:44:22 -0700
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Bill, 
> 
> I'd like undisturbed on the order of several months or years. Yes, 
> earthquakes are possible but they are rare here and interesting so that's 
> ok. Here's a once-in-a-decade one that I captured a few years ago: 
> 
> https://url.emailprotection.link/?bdmFbtBVI5fRq-9wNeYkQ-gFamK1O8vBt3YAwjEUQaSUMHPHLx-i6bKvykxCz-00ThdyGMxzxk6o8IrmSaUTCxvJs0WcGPc8YKQXXSuyy8vAq8OBpMvaoBVHqIvOyCFuf
>  
> 
> The main thing is to avoid "cultural noise" -- local seismic activity caused 
> by cars, trucks, doors opening and closing, people walking, A/C or 
> mechanical appliances going on and off, etc. This is best done by locating 
> the clocks away from roads, away from the house, in a solid 
> compartment weighing many tons, underground in virgin soil or bedrock.
> 
> Hi Tom,
> 
> A "compartment weighing many tons" is a low pass filter good against 
> "cultural noise" but not so good against earth quake or earth tide
> noise. A "compartment weighing many tons" is strongly coupled to the earth. 
> The opposite approach is to uncouple from the earth as
> much as possible. Your earthquake enviornment in the Pacific northwest is 
> similar to here in Alaska. Your precision pendulum clock
> is good enough to respond to monthly/daily earth tides. There is a 'catch 22' 
> in trying to protect a pendulum clock. The pendulum
> depends on constant acceleration of gravity. It ain't constant. If g varies 
> or is noisy by one part in N then that sets the point of diminishing
> return in your protection efforts.
> 
> Bill
> 
> /tvb 
> On 9/8/2021 7:36 PM, Bill Beam wrote:
> 
> Tom,
> 
> How long do you expect your proposed voult to go undisturbed?
> I have several pendulum clocks. They are disturbed every couple of months
> by earth quakes. By disturbed, I mean pendulum banging against the case 
> walls....
> Any ground motion that can be felt will upset the clocks. Often the clocks 
> will
> signal an earth quake that is not felt.
> 
> Good luck.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Bill Beam
> NL7F
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Bill Beam
> NL7F
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 14
> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 15:17:22 -0700
> From: "Lux, Jim" <j...@luxfamily.com>
> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: in-ground clock room
> To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> Message-ID: <dbb895a4-371c-81bb-2ae0-7a9822746...@luxfamily.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
> On 9/8/21 6:54 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote:
>> I am considering a below ground "clock room" away from the house. This 
>> will be for some low-drift quartz oscillators and also a couple of 
>> precision pendulum clocks. The goal is long-term, unattended, and very 
>> undisturbed operation.
>> 
>> For scale, assume the room is 1 meter × 1 meter × 2 meters deep. So 
>> that's vastly smaller than digging a basement, but much larger than 
>> drilling a 8 inch round pipe. Digging down gives some natural 
>> isolation and temperature regulation. A couple tons of concrete gives 
>> high stability vertical walls for the pendulum clocks.
>> 
>> If any of you have personal or professional experience with the design 
>> or construction of this sort of thing, especially experience with 
>> precast (utility) vaults or poured concrete, please let me know.
>> 
> A few years back, we were looking at building a "test rubble pile" for 
> search and rescue applications (actually for testing equipment that 
> would be used for this).
> 
> For the depths you're talking about (few meters) the easiest approach is 
> to get someone with a backhoe to dig a pit, then use the backhoe to 
> carry the precast vault, drop it in, and you're done.  If you were going 
> more than "backhoe depth" you're looking at something like an auger, and 
> they can drill any diameter (up to about 4 feet) and any depth, as long 
> as they can get the truck into position (same as the backhoe).
> 
> I went around looking at the precast concrete vendors - they're 
> available in any size you want. You can also just sink a drain pipe of 
> any size vertically, and fill the bottom with concrete. The vaults often 
> come with "knockouts" - places where you can bring conduit in by 
> knocking out the plug of concrete (it's cast with a thin ring, so you 
> hit it with a sledge) - the conduit (or duct, or sewer pipe) to vault 
> seal is done with a variety of goops. Some of the ones I've seen look 
> like tar (the same stuff used to fix roads, roofs, shower pans), others 
> use some sort of foam.
> 
> The prices for this stuff are fairly standardized - your local utility 
> or roads department probably has a "standard bid list" for most of the 
> more common items that they use for doing estimates. Caltrans certainly 
> does (a 48" precast concrete manhole is about $1500). So that gives you 
> a ballpark when you start calling vendors.  The big driver for most 
> people in a "residential" environment would be access.  It's one thing 
> to have a double flatbed show up with a bunch of concrete pipe on it at 
> a business, totally another on a winding residential street.  We had 
> stuff delivered on a flatbed truck with a small crane - but they could 
> just pull up to the site, sling the vault, and lower it to the ground, 
> and then the backhoe guy moved it.   Going up a driveway, around the 
> corner, avoiding the fence, etc. would be different. Or, A *really big* 
> crane - I've seen that done - 80 or 100 foot boom in the street - they 
> pick the load up, lift it up and over the house and place it in the back 
> yard.
> 
> https://url.emailprotection.link/?b4vU3x8i5fTvyzlQz6y9GOCtVn2tdfzrFSR54T5cRl_uAtXpIOtBBqqwnV4vvFy1BmFE0feOJrmWRAW6qHW8lkO6-L7cdYeUDZSpmMaEHfuxRGyelFEjAK6MatgClTQ9f
> 
> https://url.emailprotection.link/?bMgheXmXOXXWGkEGh8fPBr6lrAr7Q86Lv2pzXVXq2h2r6_ZhJY1XlJ6RJXJzCSe7od5P0dH6_AGbo4tSHU_9d3dnFyDDiNcXCASM95efa7VWFoeLurCDQb4g3_4LRgWkW
> 
> https://url.emailprotection.link/?bVk3-XAtcEXlrmrcOdaAPyyNHDetyE--dojTOGrR3Q1jmKx0N586lNzcUPLMddNAV7AFKoc4NMWmZVMAgYIkuvHw_TAaIGWVfhJ4hoixRP-POCndpSfmCsbHIJwmgK3qa
> 
> Google "precast concrete manhole" and select accordingly.
> 
> 
> 
> You're looking at the "more than $1000 probably less than $10k" range, 
> all done in a day, plus a day of prep and a day of cleanup.
> 
> Backhoes (in SoCal) are going for $300-500/day plus the operator 
> ($50-60/hr).. Or you can learn <grin> - it's hard to do precise work as 
> a rookie, but digging a hole is pretty easy to learn on your own.  And I 
> just looked it up, the smaller skid-steer bobcat type could probably dig 
> a 2 meter deep hole, and you're less likely to do major damage like you 
> can with a full sized unit.
> 
> Home Depot actually rents them.. 2-3 ton miniexcavator is $359/day , 
> $1005/week
> 
> https://url.emailprotection.link/?bxi_ZidtnD6xI2zzRsDcyqHffqrVSTox2oC_9uR1Wn__cx-QkF7-Kv6g3eSHSQXVRCEScpWUjnFhYyGMh7sNJsLTX7jEpYYFUeXU-3m8m5VxPLSAdykYV5m7GHxP5C7EKwkjeioOHRo2PxK0hM71HEHd0OMGm7kPpMvrEMyYWd90~
> You might find someone who's usually doing stuff like pools and spas, 
> and will dig your hole for you. In any case, probably not more than $1000
> 
> 
> One other source for design is "storm shelters" - FEMA has published 
> pre-engineered designs for a variety of inground shelters (often, 
> installed below a garage)
> 
> 
> One final thing - even if it's waterproofed, it *will collect water* 
> either by condensation or seepage. You might need to make your clock 
> vault have some sort of dehumidifier and/or sump pump.
> 
> 
> The other alternative is to "build a basement" - dig the hole by hand, 
> pour a slab, and either pour walls or stack blocks and pour into the 
> cavities.  1x1x2 meters is sort of doable.. figure standard 8x16" 
> blocks, so the "hole" is going to be 16+39=55" square - figure 5 ft.  
> That's big enough to stand in, but there is a significant cave-in 
> hazard, If you're down 2 meters, and the side collapses on you, you'll 
> probably die before they can dig you out. Or, your soil is sturdy 
> enough, you manage the risk.
> I don't think you could dig 2 meters down with one of those small bobcat 
> backhoes or excavators, you'd have to dig a ramp, stack your blocks, 
> then backfill.
> 
> 
>> In case this gets too off-topic for time-nuts, off-list email to me is 
>> fine (t...@leapsecond.com).
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> /tvb
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe 
>> send an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
>> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 15
> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 18:03:08 -0500
> From: "Graham / KE9H" <ke9h.gra...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: in-ground clock room
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>       <time-nuts@lists.febo.com>
> Message-ID:
>       <CAPyJ-YWhz_C7r=mej91skkmeqtba7rrxvkzatbyca3carqo...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> 
> Sounds like we need a volunteer time-nut with motion picture camera
> capability to document this event.
> --- Graham
> 
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 5:17 PM Lux, Jim <j...@luxfamily.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 9/8/21 6:54 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote:
>>> I am considering a below ground "clock room" away from the house. This
>>> will be for some low-drift quartz oscillators and also a couple of
>>> precision pendulum clocks. The goal is long-term, unattended, and very
>>> undisturbed operation.
>>> 
>>> For scale, assume the room is 1 meter × 1 meter × 2 meters deep. So
>>> that's vastly smaller than digging a basement, but much larger than
>>> drilling a 8 inch round pipe. Digging down gives some natural
>>> isolation and temperature regulation. A couple tons of concrete gives
>>> high stability vertical walls for the pendulum clocks.
>>> 
>>> If any of you have personal or professional experience with the design
>>> or construction of this sort of thing, especially experience with
>>> precast (utility) vaults or poured concrete, please let me know.
>>> 
>> A few years back, we were looking at building a "test rubble pile" for
>> search and rescue applications (actually for testing equipment that
>> would be used for this).
>> 
>> For the depths you're talking about (few meters) the easiest approach is
>> to get someone with a backhoe to dig a pit, then use the backhoe to
>> carry the precast vault, drop it in, and you're done.  If you were going
>> more than "backhoe depth" you're looking at something like an auger, and
>> they can drill any diameter (up to about 4 feet) and any depth, as long
>> as they can get the truck into position (same as the backhoe).
>> 
>> I went around looking at the precast concrete vendors - they're
>> available in any size you want. You can also just sink a drain pipe of
>> any size vertically, and fill the bottom with concrete. The vaults often
>> come with "knockouts" - places where you can bring conduit in by
>> knocking out the plug of concrete (it's cast with a thin ring, so you
>> hit it with a sledge) - the conduit (or duct, or sewer pipe) to vault
>> seal is done with a variety of goops. Some of the ones I've seen look
>> like tar (the same stuff used to fix roads, roofs, shower pans), others
>> use some sort of foam.
>> 
>> The prices for this stuff are fairly standardized - your local utility
>> or roads department probably has a "standard bid list" for most of the
>> more common items that they use for doing estimates. Caltrans certainly
>> does (a 48" precast concrete manhole is about $1500). So that gives you
>> a ballpark when you start calling vendors.  The big driver for most
>> people in a "residential" environment would be access.  It's one thing
>> to have a double flatbed show up with a bunch of concrete pipe on it at
>> a business, totally another on a winding residential street.  We had
>> stuff delivered on a flatbed truck with a small crane - but they could
>> just pull up to the site, sling the vault, and lower it to the ground,
>> and then the backhoe guy moved it.   Going up a driveway, around the
>> corner, avoiding the fence, etc. would be different. Or, A *really big*
>> crane - I've seen that done - 80 or 100 foot boom in the street - they
>> pick the load up, lift it up and over the house and place it in the back
>> yard.
>> 
>> https://url.emailprotection.link/?b4vU3x8i5fTvyzlQz6y9GOCtVn2tdfzrFSR54T5cRl_uAtXpIOtBBqqwnV4vvFy1BmFE0feOJrmWRAW6qHW8lkO6-L7cdYeUDZSpmMaEHfuxRGyelFEjAK6MatgClTQ9f
>> 
>> https://url.emailprotection.link/?bMgheXmXOXXWGkEGh8fPBr6lrAr7Q86Lv2pzXVXq2h2r6_ZhJY1XlJ6RJXJzCSe7od5P0dH6_AGbo4tSHU_9d3dnFyDDiNcXCASM95efa7VWFoeLurCDQb4g3_4LRgWkW
>> 
>> https://url.emailprotection.link/?bVk3-XAtcEXlrmrcOdaAPyyNHDetyE--dojTOGrR3Q1jmKx0N586lNzcUPLMddNAV7AFKoc4NMWmZVMAgYIkuvHw_TAaIGWVfhJ4hoixRP-POCndpSfmCsbHIJwmgK3qa
>> 
>> Google "precast concrete manhole" and select accordingly.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> You're looking at the "more than $1000 probably less than $10k" range,
>> all done in a day, plus a day of prep and a day of cleanup.
>> 
>> Backhoes (in SoCal) are going for $300-500/day plus the operator
>> ($50-60/hr).. Or you can learn <grin> - it's hard to do precise work as
>> a rookie, but digging a hole is pretty easy to learn on your own.  And I
>> just looked it up, the smaller skid-steer bobcat type could probably dig
>> a 2 meter deep hole, and you're less likely to do major damage like you
>> can with a full sized unit.
>> 
>> Home Depot actually rents them.. 2-3 ton miniexcavator is $359/day ,
>> $1005/week
>> 
>> 
>> https://url.emailprotection.link/?bxi_ZidtnD6xI2zzRsDcyqHffqrVSTox2oC_9uR1Wn__cx-QkF7-Kv6g3eSHSQXVRCEScpWUjnFhYyGMh7sNJsLTX7jEpYYFUeXU-3m8m5VxPLSAdykYV5m7GHxP5C7EKwkjeioOHRo2PxK0hM71HEHd0OMGm7kPpMvrEMyYWd90~
>> You might find someone who's usually doing stuff like pools and spas,
>> and will dig your hole for you. In any case, probably not more than $1000
>> 
>> 
>> One other source for design is "storm shelters" - FEMA has published
>> pre-engineered designs for a variety of inground shelters (often,
>> installed below a garage)
>> 
>> 
>> One final thing - even if it's waterproofed, it *will collect water*
>> either by condensation or seepage. You might need to make your clock
>> vault have some sort of dehumidifier and/or sump pump.
>> 
>> 
>> The other alternative is to "build a basement" - dig the hole by hand,
>> pour a slab, and either pour walls or stack blocks and pour into the
>> cavities.  1x1x2 meters is sort of doable.. figure standard 8x16"
>> blocks, so the "hole" is going to be 16+39=55" square - figure 5 ft.
>> That's big enough to stand in, but there is a significant cave-in
>> hazard, If you're down 2 meters, and the side collapses on you, you'll
>> probably die before they can dig you out. Or, your soil is sturdy
>> enough, you manage the risk.
>> I don't think you could dig 2 meters down with one of those small bobcat
>> backhoes or excavators, you'd have to dig a ramp, stack your blocks,
>> then backfill.
>> 
>> 
>>> In case this gets too off-topic for time-nuts, off-list email to me is
>>> fine (t...@leapsecond.com).
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> /tvb
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe
>>> send an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send
>> an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 16
> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 20:47:29 -0400
> From: Ben Bradley <ben.pi.brad...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: in-ground clock room
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>       <time-nuts@lists.febo.com>
> Message-ID:
>       <CA+wjhVsKT67AOghjXT91LwupF0FG3v=xiqex4q0-2jvrqyh...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> 
> I've seen discussion of making a seismic vault (though not sure if
> they used that name, making it harder to find in the haystack of
> posts) on this mailing list, maybt 15 or 20 years ago, so nut sure if
> this is helpful:
> https://url.emailprotection.link/?bj4D6X82wPC9xeltcsFCTXzK_O0xDS6ilwrNrr973O-CWyDkiYmR6AtIlije3Uhl-EhDjaWB722xAQMGo5pYzKsypwE_cPrdr7cPkFE8GrFQ48neYZCy5Hu7yuZjpSqlB
> 
> For possible immunity from earthquakes, LIGO uses some quite complex
> control and feedback systems to hang its mirrors so that mild
> earthquakes and local noise won't affect them. From what I've seen
> over the years a lot of this info has been published, but I imagine it
> would be quite expensive to reproduce. Maybe some sort of Ligo Lite
> system would be feasible.
> 
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 10:13 AM Brent <brent.ev...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Seismic vaults are built similar to your requirements.  I suggest looking
>> up the Earthscope program - there should be info out on the web as to how
>> their vaults were designed, but in a nutshell, dig a hole, put some gravel
>> in the bottom, place a large culvert on end in the hole, pour a few inches
>> of concrete in the culvert, put instrumentation in a pedestal inside, run
>> power and comms, put a bilge pump and outflow pipe in it on the floor
>> (below pedastal), and put a cap on the whole thing.  Those were then
>> re-buried, but that prevents easy access (although it probably improves
>> temperature stability). A septic tank would be larger, but more effort, and
>> may expose more surface area to the sun (temp variation).
>> 
>> I've been in various seismic vaults and they can vary from very extravagant
>> to downright crude.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 9:04 AM Bob kb8tq <kb...@n1k.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi
>>> 
>>> You could do some research on the climate in various parts of the world.
>>> Pick the ideal location and move there :) :) You also could optimize the
>>> location for various tidal forces ….
>>> 
>>> How deep can you go on your property before you run into something
>>> massive? Around here, I can go down between a foot and maybe two
>>> feet. At that point it’s time for dynamite. You do not ask “how much to
>>> put in a swimming pool?” in this neighborhood.  Part of this is the
>>> geology,
>>> part is how the builder graded things to  put in the subdivision.
>>> 
>>> While that *sounds* ideal, the shale is tilted due to some thing running
>>> into
>>> something else a while ago. The net result is ground water running here
>>> and there to some fairly significant depths. As the seasons change that
>>> ground water and its somewhat random route changes isn’t ideal for
>>> temperature stability.
>>> 
>>> Yes, it’s all about some *very* local aspects of your geology.  With some
>>> care, I could move a few miles in one direction or another and be in a
>>> *very*
>>> different situation. (again thanks to just how this ran into that ….).
>>> 
>>> Since temperature stability is only part of the design and mechanical
>>> stability is the other. This location might work ok for half of the design
>>> goals …. Granite likely would do better than fractured shale though ...
>>> 
>>> Bob
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 9, 2021, at 1:20 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <p...@phk.freebsd.dk>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> --------
>>>> Tom Van Baak writes:
>>>> 
>>>>> For scale, assume the room is 1 meter × 1 meter × 2 meters deep. So
>>>>> that's vastly smaller than digging a basement, but much larger than
>>>>> drilling a 8 inch round pipe. Digging down gives some natural isolation
>>>>> and temperature regulation. A couple tons of concrete gives high
>>>>> stability vertical walls for the pendulum clocks.
>>>> 
>>>> I researched this extensively before we built a house 5 years ago.
>>>> 
>>>> Look at the plot on page 37 in this paper:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> https://url.emailprotection.link/?bUQcqOjURXhTPB6JfDc92MEONol3xTSgYvfeJ8BbiBWRjdyPVNx0zkKcKHTkrvxHEUgotv-qebTvJWhqYNQ7vZ5PmnBkg4k4h3etdOL-lB35s4BUytlJhLgWSYHxkU2mT3qsp3DRrx7JvchbPB-BTzWEvV1ZErfgyCy4iwT8fE2oN0ulm9DaMsjEqQThbX3q7ylNve8Qz8EIqdBClbB4zPA~~
>>>> 
>>>> It shows that in Denmark the yearly temperature variations in
>>>> penetrates to a depth of 15 meters, and that even at 10 meters
>>>> depth, you can expect the swing to be several Kelvin in any year.
>>>> 
>>>> I did find handwaving which said tree-cover reduced the swing by
>>>> "a lot" but no measurements to substantiate it.
>>>> 
>>>> In the end I concluded that I could do better in the comfort of my lab.
>>>> 
>>>> You should try to find similar data for your local climate and
>>>> geology, before you pour too much money into a hole in the ground.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
>>>> p...@freebsd.org         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
>>>> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
>>>> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by
>>> incompetence.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe
>>> send an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
>>>> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send
>>> an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an 
>> email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
> %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of time-nuts Digest, Vol 209, Issue 7
> *****************************************
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an 
> email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an 
email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to