During evaluation of a GPS module there was some concern over the
stability/correctness of the PPS and, as the NIST paper on PPS accuracy
mentions there could be substantial variation in PPS accuracy due to
atmospheric conditions, an experiment was set up to measure the PPS of 3
different GPS modules simultaneously.
The experiment uses one NEO-7M and two ATGM336H GPS modules
The PPS of each module is send to 3 separate timer capture inputs of one
timer running at 200 MHz providing 5 ns measurement accuracy.
The 200 MHz timer was clocked using a 10 MHz Rb output up converted to
200 MHz using a PLL.
A plot showing the timing variation is attached.
Vertical axis is in ns, horizontal axis is in seconds
All GPS modules had separate simple puck antenna all with almost free
sky view and all using at least 10 GPS satellites.
The differences between the PPS of the 3 modules was surprisingly large,
two modules where in average 10 ns apart and a 3rd module was in average
39 ns apart from the first two modules. More investigation is needed as
the HW paths between PPS output of the GPS modules and the timer capture
inputs of the 3 timers are not fully identical
One GPS module showed little variation in PPS timing versus the Rb
reference, only a slow drift of about 15 ns over 400 seconds. The other
modules showed a periodic variation of up to 20 ns. The worst variation
was observed from the NEO-7M module.
The measurement is at time of posting of this message still running to
see if over a longer period the differences reduce.
If the observed short term (< 400 s) PPS variation in the order of
10-20 ns are common and unavoidable it would make sense for the
requirement for phase stability of a GPSDO to be aligned with this level
of PPS phase uncertainty.
Erik.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
