Hi Hans-Georg,

Does the E1740A also has the STP2945 as timing reference?

First of all, you have nice illustrations of the white phase modulation noise slopes, of tau^1.5 as expected in the MDEV. Trouble is, it's not pure WPM noise, but a mixture of the noise and the quantization effect. So, it would be good if the E1740A is known to either free-float or locked to one of the references.

By using MDEV you utilize the averaging benefits over the ADEV, giving a sqrt(1E7) benefit as you hit 1 s. However, while your slope will roughly coincide with the single-shot resolution, it's exact position is more complex. The relative frequency may cause the resolution to go up and down due to systematic nature, and the noise in addition to the signal will intermodulate with the systematics.

If you have both these long-term locked to a stable source, it should stabilize. Also, since you have a slow beating pattern of the systematics, exactly when you measure may decide if it is high or low on that valey.

You very clearly see systematic noise in the phase noise. These are for sure fighing against you.

Do more of these phase noise analysis and see if any of the systematics there coinside with high or low noise, or if indeed the noise floor moves up and down.

This slope is more tricky than it get credit for.

Cheers,
Magnus

On 2022-06-23 22:56, Hans-Georg Lehnard via time-nuts wrote:
I am trying to find out the limits of my measuring devices and
oscillators. Therefore I made 2 series of measurements with the same
conditions. In the first series I got 1 out of 10 and in the second 2
out of 10 results with much less noise. I looked at the results in
Timelab and then exported one good and one not so good result (recorded
4 minutes earlier) to stable32 for further analysis. Is this a problem
of my measurement setup or an artifact in the measurements. My
measurement device is a HP E1740A Time interval analyzer with about 50ps
(4.8828124999999998046875e-11) resolution. A Samsung STP2945LF (free
running) from my GPSDO as reference and the reference output of my
BG7TBL FA2 as measurement object. Attached are the results from the 2
series and the 2 further analyzed from the first series.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com

Reply via email to