Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 05:13:57PM -0800, John Pettitt wrote: > >> All N=169 Delay Offset Jitter >> Median 81.259 0.245 1.378 >> > > This seems to say that the median of the entire data set is closer to > reality than the median of any of its subparts... That fails the sanity > check. > > I think this is from the stratum 1's having a negative median. What > happens if you take the absolute value of each offset first? > _______________________________________________ > The point was to find out what the collective view of the time was and since some art positive and some are negative the median can be negative. If I took the absolute I can see that it would tell me how far a typical pool server is from my S1 - maybe I'll do that in the next generation of stats. I'm still playing with what to graph and how to represent it (If there are any stat;s junkies out there who want to offer suggestions on meaningful things to graph please let me know).
John _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
