On Jul 8, 2006, at 1:11 PM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
This of course makes it pretty hard for the pool guys to get a decent metric of servers to include in the pool, as you most probably have to have a distributed weighted monitoring to work around partial crappy connectivity.
It's in the works. Or rather, it's in my head -- I haven't had time to actually implement it...
If anyone is serious about it, good with Perl and can spend 5-10 hours a week for a little while to help out then send me a mail off- list. Otherwise then I'll get to it eventually. :-)
IPv6 is still uncommon enough that I don't see it as too urgent yet (although I might have a misconception about that being in the U.S.).
I'm happy to see the tests being done that it's feasible to use and test IPv6 ntp after all. I thought the latencies would be much worse.
- ask -- http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/ _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
