On Tue, September 18, 2007 21:36, Jan Hoevers said: > Nelson Minar wrote on 18-9-2007 17:05: >> Thanks for demonstrating how, in theory, a NAT router can avoid keeping >> state for NTP packets if there's manual port forwarding. >> >> In practice, are cheap consumer routers smart enough to not maintain >> state? I'm worried about things like the Linksys WRT54G with stock >> firmware. And I'm guessing they're not. > > No, cheap consumer routers will probably not do the job. > An old 300 MHz PC with some cheap nic's probably will.
There are plenty of free "firmwares" that _will probably do_ the job - at least for the WRT type of routers. -- Björn _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
