On Oct 3, 2007, at 8:46, Nelson Minar wrote: > Still, I love data and would be happy to see that stratum data > online. Even better would be measures of everyone's jitter, root > dispersion, etc. I'm curious how good the pool server's clocks > really are. But that's all work for Ask, and the new DNS is so > awesome I'm loathe to request another pony.
Exactly -- what I want more of is the jitter etc data. That's interesting. Stratum is too misunderstood to be of value by itself. One of my plans is to, for the servers that'll give out the data, track which upstream servers is being used (partially to detect if a server in the pool is configured with pool.ntp.org servers) and the data values you mention. As you noticed you have the permission bit in the system to get you a list of servers. I can also make you a dump of the servers and log_scores tables with the pool monitoring data from the last ~4 months if you want to see if the monitoring system generally find stratum 1 servers to be more accurate. I suspect that within the inaccuracy of the monitoring system they aren't any better... - ask -- http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/ _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
