i was just reading several documents that used by default the iburst option 
for remote servers. is this a 'proper' practice?

is it better than not having anything after the server name?

eg: from the document:

server  0.uk.pool.ntp.org       iburst
server  1.uk.pool.ntp.org       iburst

-- 

Chuck



_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers

Reply via email to