On Wednesday 31 October 2007 11.25:45 Maurice Janssen wrote: > Can you give 82.94.107.211 and 82.94.107.216 a try? These servers are > also running OpenNTPD and are somewhat closer to you (Netherlands).
Hmm.
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
==============================================================================
*193.247.72.14 192.53.103.108 2 u 92 1024 377 3.053 -0.888 0.108
-195.216.64.208 129.69.1.153 2 u 184 1024 377 2.899 -2.803 0.042
-217.147.223.78 129.132.2.21 3 u 410 1024 377 3.010 -1.509 1.266
-194.97.156.5 131.188.3.222 2 u 320 1024 377 19.182 -0.473 1.287
-193.192.51.156 193.62.22.74 2 u 367 1024 377 20.351 -0.475 0.225
-193.228.143.12 192.36.144.22 2 u 72 1024 377 37.901 1.548 0.203
+193.138.215.196 129.132.2.21 3 u 42 1024 377 1.843 -0.944 0.168
+212.103.65.133 129.132.2.21 3 u 70 1024 377 1.062 -1.070 0.168
-162.23.41.34 162.23.3.171 3 u 102 1024 377 3.431 1.506 0.176
-129.132.2.21 129.132.2.22 2 u 478 1024 377 3.021 -1.198 0.003
-140.99.51.115 131.216.1.101 3 u 199 1024 377 164.561 -5.551 0.163
-82.94.107.211 20.103.246.37 2 u 814 1024 377 33.680 1.149 89.700
-82.94.107.216 154.253.69.230 2 u 859 1024 377 56.304 12.913 65.630
Note that 140.99.51.115 has low jitter now, while your two servers are
beyond bad. (Also, the offset on .216 seems unnaturally high.)
Could it be that openntpd steps the clock occasionally, leading to high
jitter values sometimes - and if the clock runs fine enough, it leaves it
alone so on a clock that is not bad in itself, it will have very high jitter
for a few hours and low jitter most of the time?
cheers
-- vbi
--
I've never been DPL (AFAICT)
-- Pierre Habouzit on debian-vote, 2007-07-31
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
