On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:25:26 -0700, Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Sarcasm aside, and baiting aside, is there anything about these servers >that makes them unsuitable for pool servers? I'm sure there are nits and >minor criticisms, valid and otherwise. But if we keep to the real issue >about the pool then I'd be happy to know why these servers don't fit the >bill. Well, there's apparently a superior peak-to-average ratio when compared to time.rabendary.net (<http://www.pool.ntp.org/scores/64.183.187.9>), which we really can't have, old boy. mdr -- Doctrine, when it lets its hair down, can trample, without fear, even the most innocent of truths. -- Frederico Garcia Lorca _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
