I can't answer your full question; the jitter seems strange to me. A
few thoughts, though:

- NTP prefers lower-strata clocks. Thus it likes the "darkcity.cerius"
host, a stratum 1, more than Blue, at stratum 2. (Throw ntp.conf the
"prefer" keyword on red to make it, well, prefer Blue's time.)

- NTP doesn't know the "right" time, per se, but it sees that the
"darkcity" host has a +3ms offset, as does the "europium" Canonical
host, and the other preferred one is +5ms. Thus Blue's very small
negative offset is an "outlier," correct or not. (You've got to love
when a 4ms difference constitutes an outlier!) Essentially, each host
is just 'guessing' (through scientific means) which is the most
accurate and holds it as the standard. Your two systems sync to a
(partially) different list of servers, so they're choosing different
clocks to hold as correct, hence them not quite agreeing.

- Blue's IP, 192.43.244.18, is not a conventional "non-routable"
internal IP. The delay amounts to about 14ms latency, so I have a
strong hunch that you're going out the router and back in, or at least
passing through a router that's introducing some latency. I'd try a
traceroute from red to blue to verify.

Hope this helps!
-- Matt (N1ZYY)

On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Kipton Moravec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have two Ubuntu computers. A server (Blue) and a workstation (red).
>
> I thought I would set up Blue as a NTP server, and have red get time
> from it and the pool.
>
> Blue says its time is good, but red says blue is an outlier.
>
> Blue is a 3.0 GHz Pentium, with 512M RAM and not doing anything else at
> the moment (not even file serving). They are connected together with an
> 8 port switch. So there is no distance between them.
>
> Here is Blue:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ntpq -p
>     remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset
> jitter
> ==============================================================================
> +europium.canoni 192.36.133.17    2 u  507 1024  377  116.412    3.837
> 1.207
> -server1-a.your. 64.202.112.75    2 u  526 1024  377   32.929    6.629
> 0.734
> +ntp1.us.grundcl 164.67.62.212    2 u  443 1024  377   46.272    3.858
> 0.653
> -ntp.LogicX.net  18.103.0.198     2 u  266 1024  375   55.304   -1.035
> 0.644
> *time.nist.gov   .ACTS.           1 u  478 1024  377   32.773    2.198
> 0.201
> -ntp3.tamu.edu   128.194.254.7    3 u  414 1024  377   46.361   13.276
> 1.496
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ntptrace
> localhost: stratum 2, offset 0.002716, synch distance 0.041578
> time.nist.gov: stratum 1, offset 0.000000, synch distance 0.002650,
> refid 'ACTS'
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
>
> Here is red:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ ntpq -p
>     remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset
> jitter
> ==============================================================================
> +europium.canoni 192.36.133.17    2 u   91 1024  377  116.228    3.783
> 0.903
> -Blue            192.43.244.18    2 u   72 1024  377    0.144   -0.415
> 2.072
> *darkcity.cerias .GPS.            1 u  315 1024  377   56.111    3.591
> 11.436
> -tesla.fireduck. 198.82.1.201     3 u  122 1024  377   53.209   -2.050
> 0.208
> -clock.trit.net  192.12.19.20     2 u  108 1024  377   43.304  -10.235
> 0.827
> +server.donkeyfl 18.26.4.105      2 u  125 1024  377   56.097    5.461
> 0.514
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ ntptrace
> localhost: stratum 2, offset 0.002221, synch distance 0.062901
> 128.10.252.7: timed out, nothing received
> ***Request timed out
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $
>
> Why does red not use the data from Blue?
>
> What would cause Blue to have so much jitter when they are so close
> together? Do I have something set wrong?
>
> Kip
> --
> Kipton Moravec KE5NGX
> "Always do right; this will gratify some people and astonish the rest."
> --Mark Twain
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> timekeepers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
>
_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers

Reply via email to