Ronan Flood wrote:
dns1.rmplc.co.uk
gw1-if1-c4l.priorityonline.net
These are still reporting an incorrect leap second.
Now looking OK.
When I looked earlier today dns1.rmplc.co.uk and
gw1-if1-c4l.priorityonline.net were both listing one of the ja.net
servers as their sources. The ja.net servers weren't declaring a
leap second
I fixed the ja.net servers back in January, reducing their peer sets
to avoid bad incoming leap indications.
Although my sample is very limited, I'm see no spurious leap second
indications at the moment. An improvement, so thanks for the fixes,
folks.
Cheers,
David
_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
