On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Guus Sliepen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:49:52PM -0600, Rob Townley wrote: > > > this node doesnt have two nics, the public address is for those > > connecting from the public side of the NAT. As far as that tinc node > > knows, it is using 655. i will look elsewhwere for the connection > > problem. dynamic dns of port number could help tinc get better meta > > knowledge about itself. > > Hm, what kind of NAT? If you have a Linux box with netfilter, then if tinc > behind that NAT makes an outgoing connection first, it will probably keep > 655 > as the source port. > There would be multiple outgoing tinc nodes behind a NAT, only one could be 655. Dynamic port numbers make me feel more secure. > > > What was the name of the dns library you recommended? Does it work > > with dnsmasq? > > I do not remember recommending a DNS library... Maybe I mentioned > dyndns.org? > it was a programming library. It definitely wasn't dyndns.org because i have been using that for over a decade. > > > Do you use gdb debugger? > > Yes, it's an invaluable tool. > Great. I hope to attempt to run some of tinc through gdb. > > -- > Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, > Guus Sliepen <[email protected]> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkt2elEACgkQAxLow12M2nv8KACfd9hYRxnpTWraUlSeYfC6rtQg > i00AmgOn0gpB0bovt86hhKHZaojljraw > =dul/ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > tinc mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc > >
_______________________________________________ tinc mailing list [email protected] http://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc
