Hello,
Am 04/06/2014 04:37 PM, schrieb shikkc: >> How will tinc route packages to 172.27.0.0/16 and fdd3:5d16:b5dd:3::0/64 >> sent from A? >> >> * Will load balancing between B1 and B2 take place? >> * Is the decision stable - eg. is 172.27.23.42 routeded using B1 all >> time? >> * Is anybody running similar setups? > > In my experience with this, tinc seems to (for unknown reasons) prefer > the route with the first alphabetically named host. For example in our > setup if a host is named 'elephant', and another named 'donkey', the > host 'donkey' will route all of this traffic and 'elephant' will be > unused. I have not yet taken the time to dig through the source looking > for a reason to explain this, but it happens consistently and regardless > of the distance of nodes. Thanks for your feedback. Can you recommend a way for archieving load balancing? Ie: Using OSPF and tinc in switched mode? Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ tinc mailing list [email protected] http://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc
