Hello All
I probably encountered a possible bug of tinycc (on debian linux sid amd64, Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q9550 @ 2.83GHz,
2.6.31 kernel, 8Gb RAM) with either the official 0.9.25 or the latest git of tinycc.
The behavior of the generated *.so is different when compiled with tcc or when compiled with gcc-4.2, gcc-4.3, gcc-4.4,
latest gcc-trunk 4.5.0 20091108, latest clang 1.1 (trunk 86296)... When running (i.e. dlopen-ing) the *.so generated by
tcc, there is SIGSEGV which does not occur with the same *.so compiled by other cited compilers. So I am strongly
suspecting tinycc.
The source code I am compiling is big. It is GPLv3 free software, FSF copyrighted. It is my MELT branch of GCC. It is a
file of 160KLOC or 180KLOC of generated C code (gcc/melt/warmelt-normal-0.c)
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/MiddleEndLispTranslator
The idea of MELT is to provide a Lisp dialect specialized for coding GCC plugins, translated into C code suitable for
GCC internals. And the MELT translator is bootstrapped, so is coded in MELT (files warmelt*.melt) and generates itself
(files warmelt*.c): so warmelt*0.c files are in the source repository. They are compiled into warmelt*0.so files. These
files are dlopen-ed by cc1 to generate the warmelt*1.c files in the build tree from the warmelt*.melt file of the source
tree. These warmelt*1.c files are compiled into warmelt*1.so files, which are dlopen-ed by cc1 to generated
warmelt*2.c. Again, these are compiled into warmelt*2.so. etc.
To reproduce the bug.
Fetch the MELT branch, configure it, build it with GCC (unless you think that tinycc is able to compile GCC). It take
time (possibly several hours). The build should go well, and it did run the cc1 dlopen-ing the warmelt*.so to generate
eg the warmelt*2.c & warmelt*3.c from the warmelt*melt files.
To make tinycc generate faulty code.
remove all the warmelt*.* files in the build directory of MELT.
Set the GCCMELT_CC environment variable to your tcc path.
Re-run make.
I am really too lazy to try to reduce that big case to something manageable, so I would understand that nobody from the
TinyCC community cares about it. If you dare investigating that, I will happily answer questions.
Regards.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
