Le mercredi 23 juin 2010 15:28:09, grischka a écrit : > Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > >> What was the problem with using just conftest.x as suggested? > > > > Compared to the $RANDOM approach this solution is far less random. > > And what is the problem with less random? I don't know but I thought if there was 2 random parts before there must have been some conflict reason which occured in the past. > > Otherwise I'd suggest to waste time with more useful things, such as > a rewrite of tccgen.c or of the macro preprocessor or an interface > with other code generators such as TCG or LLVM ;) Or rewind code which would allow tcc to compile statically, I got the message :) > > --- grischka
Thomas Preud'homme
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
