On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:42 AM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Rick Hodgin <foxmuldrs...@yahoo.com>wrote: > >> Bear in mind that while the compile time is fast, and the executable code >> is small and tight, the execution times may still be notably slower as there >> aren't optimizations like gcc has. >> >> > True, but those 0.48 seconds saved in compiling probably already make up > for any runtime speed difference! > > :) > Why not test it? :) > > -- > ----- stephan beal > http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel > >
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
