Thanks, I pushed a new commit
2011/3/1 grischka <[email protected]>
> Changming Xu wrote:
>
>> #define m(name,r) name ## r
>> #define m0(a,b,c) int m(a,b) c
>> #define m1(a,b,c) int m(a,b)c
>> m0(a, b, c);
>> m1(a, b, c);
>>
>> if only
>> spc = 0;
>>
>> m1 failed, but i have no idea if we should fix it in tcc, it's not that
>> important
>>
>
> Okay, I see. We need to force a space.
>
>
> do we have better way?
>>
>
> Don't know. Now it's up to you to choose ;)
>
>
> another example:
>>
>> #define CONC(a,b) a/**/b
>>
>>
>> to fix it, return ' ' when see a /**/comment(also c++ comment?) in
>> next_nomacro1 which
>>
>> /* comments or operator */
>> case '/':
>> PEEKC(c, p);
>> if (c == '*') {
>> p = parse_comment(p);
>> #if 1
>> tok = ' ';
>> goto keep_tok_flags;
>> #endif
>> goto redo_no_start;
>>
>>
> Yes, why not.
>
> While at it please put declaration above statements to stay
> c89 compatible. Not everybody here uses gcc to compile tcc:
>
> macro_str1 = macro_twosharps(ptr);
> int append_space = 0;
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> --- grischka
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tinycc-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
