Joe Soroka wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:00 AM, grischka <gris...@gmx.de> wrote:
I'd rather let decl0() just do the c99 case and return a value
Yes... I wanted to do that, but it didn't seem to fit with the rest of the
code. I thought this way was more tcc-like.
tcc-like in how? Any evidence of analogous hacks elsewhere in the code?
Please feel free to change it however you see fit.
Maybe I will. Until then feel free to fix incorrect variable scope ;)
int i = -1;
for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i)
printf("i = %d\n", i);
printf("i = %d\n", i);
--- grischka
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
