Le mardi 20 mars 2012 10:42:25, grischka a écrit : > Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > > What do you think of this patch? I tried with my example and yours but > > I'm afraid of breaking things now so I prefer to attach it here. > > The problem with examples is that they can show bugs that exist, but > not really the absence of bugs. To test such feature I'd rather use > some printf here or there.
printf give expected result and no complaint from valgrind. Thus I pushed the CString patch. > > Anyway, the char * argument to tcc_set_linker is not really tolerable > if we want to offer it as LIBTCCAPI to the user. Also, instead of > tcc_set_debug, tcc_set_warning, etc. it would be good to have one more > generic 'tcc_set_option' API, of course with const char* argument(s) then. > > --- grischka Thomas Preud'homme
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
