Michael, Hi. THANK YOU very much for this. I pulled, rebuilt, and then reran building and 'make test' with the gawk-4.0-stable branch and now all the tests pass! This is really great. (The compilation time speed difference w.r.t. GCC is enormous.)
Kudos to everyone. Thanks! Arnold Robbins > Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 02:42:21 +0200 (CEST) > From: Michael Matz <matz....@frakked.de> > To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] tcc x86-64 and gawk - progress > > Hi, > > On Thu, 3 May 2012, arn...@skeeve.com wrote: > > > The one remaining test failure seems to be related to handling NaN > > floating point values. Here is the diff of the test results. > > NaN handling was totally hosed for x86_64. Update your checkout of mob > branch, I fixed it. > > I've added an fairly extensive test function for all code paths that TCC > might use to expand the various comparison constructs. This might > introduce failures on the other targets which I can't test (i.e. other > than x86_64 or i386). If so, they are equally broken regarding comparison > behaviour with NaNs according to IEEE fp. > > > Ciao, > Michael. > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
