Vincent,

Would you mind adding your test into the test "suite". Pick tests or tests2
which ever you find easier to add to. I hope it will take only minutes
since you already have them written.

Miki.



On 27 June 2012 12:57, Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net> wrote:

> On 2012-06-27 14:38:44 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > Le mercredi 27 juin 2012 14:34:25, Milutin Jovanović a écrit :
> > > The patch looks good to me. I also did some basic tests, and the patch
> did
> > > not seem to break anything. I assumed you wanted it commited, so I did
> that
> > > in your name.
> >
> > You overtook me ;) It looks good to me and I was upgrading my i386 VM to
> test
> > it for completeness.
>
> Thanks! I've also done other tests in x86_64: various types (short,
> int, long, long long, all signed and unsigned) on both sides of the
> shift, and everything is OK with my patch.
>
> --
> Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tinycc-devel mailing list
> Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

Reply via email to