It was thus said that the Great Thomas Preud'homme once stated: > > Indeed, I agree the commit message is not very verbose as to the reason of > the > change. For people interested, the said commit is > 8bbde91f62291cb0383c2406ae6123be903c944b > > That said, the change of API seems clearly intentional, as if 0.9.25's > behavior had a fundamental problem. Thus, I'm reluctant to apply your patch > right now. Grishka, could you tell us the context behind this revert?
I don't think 0.9.25 had problems, since currently, tcc_relocate() calls tcc_relocate_ex() (if HAVE_SELINUX is not defined). The only thing I can think of is that a significant amount of code expected the 0.9.24 version of tcc_relocate() and it was easier to change 0.9.25 than to change the existing code, but that's just conjecture on my part. -spc (I did try to keep the patch as simple and isloated as possible) _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
