Ooops, sorry I was too fast to test. I was testing with new tcc but still using old generated .a bignum library. After "make clean"
Not only I can confirm you fixed the reported bug but I'm proud to tell you my bignum lib passed all possible tests (while extremely portable, this library is a real torture test for almost all operations on integers) MANY THANKS Now can continue to port OpenLisp which is another extensive torture test for C compilers C. -----Original Message----- From: tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Christian Jullien Sent: dimanche 3 février 2013 20:37 To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] ARM (RPi) compiler bug Thanks, the reported bug is fixed yet my bignum lib still makes a segment violation. I'll investigate and return to you with a new test case. C. -----Original Message----- From: tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Glöckner Sent: dimanche 3 février 2013 17:56 To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] ARM (RPi) compiler bug Hi, should be fixed in mob now, please test. Daniel _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
