It fails with gcc-4.8.1, gcc-4.7.2 and gcc-4.6.2 I also tried gcc-4.5.2,
but that failed to compile at all.



On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:01 AM, grischka <gris...@gmx.de> wrote:

> Austin English wrote:
>
>> -    gcc_major="$($CONFTEST version)"
>> -    gcc_minor="$($CONFTEST minor)"
>> +    gcc_major="$($CONFTEST v)"
>> +    gcc_minor="$($CONFTEST m)"
>>
>> it could be a gcc/mingw regression. This is gcc-4.8.1 (I haven't tried
>> other versions though).
>>
>> Would you like me to push that to mob?
>>
>
> Well, if with "./conftest version" argv[1] is "version" and
> argc == 2 but
>     switch(argc == 2 ? argv[1][0] : 0) {
> doesn't trigger
>     case 'v':
> then it looks like a compiler bug.
>
> Otherwise if argv[1] is not "version" or argc != 2 it could be a
> bug in the mingw startup code or some virus scanner interference
> with the msys shell (cygwin->BLODA).
>
> Otherwise if the machine starts making inexplicable assumptions
> about the difference between "version" and "v" on that level
> I'd seriously suspect that it was infected by google. (A joke)
>
> Anyway I'd personally not do anything with any code before I knew
> what's wrong with my compilation environment here.
>
>
> --- grischka
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tinycc-devel mailing list
> Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
>



-- 
-Austin
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

Reply via email to