It was thus said that the Great [email protected] once stated: > > Indeed, a good comparison. Let's say this way: Yes, I would be willing > to give up the prototypes and const if the compiler would become an order > of magnitude smaller and faster. (Hmm wonder if a K&R tcc-lookalike can be > made to fit into 64K code + 64K data? _That_ would be great :)
If you really want a C compiler that can fit in 64K (or 128K with split I+D) then look at Small-C. Quite popular during the late 70s/early 80s, it was written to run on 8-bit CPUs at the time. The version I have is easily 1/10 the source of TCC. -spc _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
