j...@camptocamp wrote: > Hi, > > I think that from a certain project size, it'll be really good to have such a > methodology. Small project don't really need this I agree. > yes. My point is about unifying the methodology, only, not arguing about the need for a method. It is not a matter of size imho. The proposed method can be valid for many small projects too.
j...@camptocamp wrote: > > But when you start to have more and more OpenERP project, and more complex > one, then it become a real need. > yes. obviously. j...@camptocamp wrote: > > I think the future methodology will just address the good practices and give > Partners some advices aboout integrating an Open Source ERP. Everyone will of > course be free to use it entirely (provided modules, process and methodology) > or just some part according to their own context. > we agree on this. The module is probably the key benefit. I hope it will be usable and used with different methods, even by those who will keep on doing as they did with other ERPs too. j...@camptocamp wrote: > > At the end, all we want is to increase the efficiency of Partners regarding > the OpenERP implementations. A better methodology means better projects and > better projects means happy customers :) ! In the mean while, Partners will > save time by using a good "way to work". > yes, it's a truism. j...@camptocamp wrote: > > May be it's not that realistic, but I'll give it a try anyway ! > thank you, everybody appreciates this. regards ------------------------ Dominique http://sisalp.fr , Hébergement OpenERP http://bdll.fr/openerp-serveur-gratuit.html -------------------- m2f -------------------- -- http://www.openobject.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=54435#54435 -------------------- m2f --------------------
_______________________________________________ Tinyerp-users mailing list http://tiny.be/mailman2/listinfo/tinyerp-users
