Hi Brett, You might want to take a look at the following paper and similar study:
A. Mohan, W. Hong, D. Gay, P. Buonadonna, T. Doeppner, and A. Mainwaring. End-to-End Performance Characterization of Sensornet Multihop Routing. In IEEE ICPS, 2005. If you want to discuss more, send me an email. Thanks. - om_p ------------------------------- Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:36:43 -0330 From: Brett Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Tinyos-help] Preferred TinyOS Multi-hop Routing Protocol To: tinyos-help@Millennium.Berkeley.EDU Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Hi All, I'm doing some research on multi-hop routing protocols for sensor networks and have implemented a couple of them in TinyOS. For my research, I thought it would be nice to run some performance comparisons (using various metrics) between the protocols I have implemented and a protocol that comes standard with TinyOS. However, since there are several routing protocols that come standard with TinyOS, I'm not sure which one to pick. For instance, below are the locations for several protocols found in TinyOS: - tos/lib/Route - tos/lib/MintRoute - tos/lib/MultiHopLQI I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on which one of these protocols to use in my simulations/comparisons? Ideally, I want to select the protocol that a researcher who was deploying a sensor network would be more likely to choose. Out of the existing sensor network deployments, which routing protocol seems to get the most use? Thanks, Brett _______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list Tinyos-help@Millennium.Berkeley.EDU https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
