Try this:
module A {
uses IF as IFB;
uses IF as IFC;
}
implementation {
bool iLikeAMore;
...
task void some_task() {
if (iLikeAMore)
IFA.some_command();
else
IFB.some_command();
}
}
configuration A {
}
implementation {
components A, B, C;
.
.
A.IFB -> B.IF;
A.IFC -> C.IF;
.
.
}
You could also try 'using' a parameterized interface i.e. the opposite
of providing one; combined with some enums, this might work:
configuration A {
}
implementation {
components A, B, C;
.
.
A.IF[B_IMPL] -> B;
A.IF[C_IMPL] -> C;
.
.
}
This second suggestion is just an 'out-there' thought; prob best to
stick with the first example as it is the recommend wiring.
Best regards,
Darren
Arijit Ghosh wrote:
No that will not work.
Each of the two components B and C "provides" the
interface IF. Lets assume IF has a command
some_command:
interface IF {
command result_t some_command();
}
B and C provides their own implementation.
Ex. in B, I have
command result_t IF.some_command() {
/* Some implementation */
}
And in C:
command result_t IF.some_command() {
/* Some different implementatio */
}
Now A wants to use the IF interface provided by B and
C.
How do I do it?
"Do the best you can, with what you have, where you are." -- Roosevelt
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Tinyos-help mailing list
Tinyos-help@Millennium.Berkeley.EDU
https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
