> > Now, would it be an idea to base this threshold on a percentage of the path > > ETX? For example, at 20%, a node with a path ETX of 2 would replace its > > parent by one that offers a path ETX of 1.6, whereas a node that has a path > > ETX of 10 would only switch if the new path has an ETX of 8 or lower. That > > way, it would favour optimal routes near the sink, where traffic is highest, > > and favour stable routes further down the tree. A cap would probably be > > needed on top of the percentage, so that it doesn't become impossible to > > switch in very large networks. > > It is definitely an interesting idea. You will notice that MultihopLQI > uses a similar approach. We haven't tried this for CTP. What did you > observe in your experiments?
Oh, it was just an idea that came up, I haven't had a chance to try it yet. Michiel _______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list Tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
