The bible is here:
http://nescc.sourceforge.net/papers/nesc-ref.pdf
But, as with all bibles, the "why" question is left as
an exercise for the reader. In this case the BNF is also
somewhat higher-level as well. E.g., the grammar for
'=' and '->' appears to be the same, but the the
semantics are markedly distinct.
MS
Andrea Crotti wrote:
> You're right, it does work!
> Thanks a lot!
> But why do you need that line with the =?
> And what is the = is supposed to do?
>
> Is it taken only by the nesc compiler right has nothing to do with the
> standard C assignment?
>
> Il giorno 03/giu/2010, alle ore 16.12, Mark Proctor ha scritto:
>
>> Hi,
>> I think you have to wire LedsModC to LedsModP as well.
>>
>> maybe this will work:
>>
>> configuration LedsModC {
>> provides interface LedsMod;
>> }
>>
>> implementation {
>> components LedsC;
>> components LedsModP;
>>
>> LedsMod=LedsModP.ledsMod;
>>
>> LedsModP.Leds -> LedsC.Leds;
>> }
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tinyos-help mailing list
> Tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu
> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
_______________________________________________
Tinyos-help mailing list
Tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu
https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
