So it is an exercise to port tinyos to a cheap platform?

shouldn't be too bad.

2012/3/2 Marc Barceló <the.answe...@gmail.com>

> Thanks Mr Decker,
>
> That is right, differences in hardware capabilities can be a serious
> problem for any tinyOS implementation.
> The motivation is to build a "home-made" mote installing all components
> ourselves (sensors, microcontrollers…).
>
>
> El 02/03/2012, a les 12:16, Eric Decker va escriure:
>
>
>
> 2012/3/2 Marc Barceló <the.answe...@gmail.com>
>
>> Hello to everyone,
>>
>> Has anyone installed TinyOS on a Arduino UNO platform succesfully? I have
>> to move from Iris to this platform and I would like to continue using
>> TinyOS instead of the Arduino language since I think it is more powerful,
>> especially in networking issues.
>>
>
> The 2 platforms are very different.   So you will be challenged.   I
> question the reasonableness of the port.
>
> The Iris platform uses ATmega 1281 which has 128K flash and 8K RAM while
> the UNO uses the 328 which only has 32K flash and 2K SRAM.
>
> Not really worth the effort.   Not enough code space, especially if what
> you are interested in is the network code (especially the 6lowpan code
> which is where most of the current network effort is being focused).
>
> So why do you have to move to the UNO?
>
>
>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Marc
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tinyos-help mailing list
>> Tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu
>> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Eric B. Decker
> Senior (over 50 :-) Researcher
>
>
>
>


-- 
Eric B. Decker
Senior (over 50 :-) Researcher
_______________________________________________
Tinyos-help mailing list
Tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu
https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help

Reply via email to