Dear Christian,

I'm using TelosB. And is incredible the values obtains when only works 
with Blip 2.0 + TinyRPL:


Number. of Hops (each one/ 50 m)--> 1     --> 2      --> 3
Latency (ms)                    --> 70.38 --> 110.29 --> 178.44
PRR (%)                         --> 99.52 --> 99.54  -->  98.44


But when the LPL is active this performance decreases to:

Number. of Hops (each one/ 50 m)--> 1      --> 2      --> 3
Latency (ms)                    --> 132.34 --> 269.47 --> 373.58
PRR (%)                         --> 75     --> 54     -->  39


Have you advise me how to improve this?

Regards,

Alex.

> On 07/12/2012 09:06 PM, aca...@correo.ugr.es wrote:
>> Dear all.
>>
>> I am testing TinyRPL with LPL. I found there are a poor performance when
>> TinyRPL is working with LPL  specially  in the cases is more than a hop.
>> Please someone would tell me what is the way to fix it? or if you are
>> solved this issue.
>>
>
> Which platform are you using ?
>
> Regards,
>  Christian
>
>
> --
> Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) - Institut für Telematik
>
> Christian Haas
> Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter
> Zirkel 2 / 76131 Karlsruhe
>
> Telefon: +49 721 608-48673
> Fax:     +49 721 608-46789
> E-Mail:  christian.h...@kit.edu
> WWW:     http://telematics.tm.kit.edu/staff_78.php
>
> http://www.kit.edu/
> KIT - Universität des Landes Baden-Württemberg und nationales
> Großforschungszentrum in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tinyos-help mailing list
> Tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu
> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
>


_______________________________________________
Tinyos-help mailing list
Tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu
https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help

Reply via email to