Dear Christian, I'm using TelosB. And is incredible the values obtains when only works with Blip 2.0 + TinyRPL:
Number. of Hops (each one/ 50 m)--> 1 --> 2 --> 3 Latency (ms) --> 70.38 --> 110.29 --> 178.44 PRR (%) --> 99.52 --> 99.54 --> 98.44 But when the LPL is active this performance decreases to: Number. of Hops (each one/ 50 m)--> 1 --> 2 --> 3 Latency (ms) --> 132.34 --> 269.47 --> 373.58 PRR (%) --> 75 --> 54 --> 39 Have you advise me how to improve this? Regards, Alex. > On 07/12/2012 09:06 PM, aca...@correo.ugr.es wrote: >> Dear all. >> >> I am testing TinyRPL with LPL. I found there are a poor performance when >> TinyRPL is working with LPL specially in the cases is more than a hop. >> Please someone would tell me what is the way to fix it? or if you are >> solved this issue. >> > > Which platform are you using ? > > Regards, > Christian > > > -- > Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) - Institut für Telematik > > Christian Haas > Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter > Zirkel 2 / 76131 Karlsruhe > > Telefon: +49 721 608-48673 > Fax: +49 721 608-46789 > E-Mail: christian.h...@kit.edu > WWW: http://telematics.tm.kit.edu/staff_78.php > > http://www.kit.edu/ > KIT - Universität des Landes Baden-Württemberg und nationales > Großforschungszentrum in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft > > > _______________________________________________ > Tinyos-help mailing list > Tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu > https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help > _______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list Tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help