I believe the address matching logic is in AM_STANDARD (or other AM components) which is below GENERIC_COMM. If the wiring is correct, user application does not need to do address matching.
If you post the code also, maybe it will be easier to find what problem it is... lin -- Lin Gu Univ. of Virginia / CS Dept http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lg6e On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Shruti Chugh wrote: > Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 16:58:56 -0400 (EDT) > From: Shruti Chugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Brian Bauman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Tinyos-users] Unicast addressing > > Hello: > > Does TinyOS communication stack take care of unicast addressing? > While sending a packet we encountered a problem at the receiver's end that > the packets not meant for itself ( we tried using unicast addressing) were > also received successfully. > > Does the application have to take care of address matching ? > > regards- > Shruti > > > _______________________________________________ > Tinyos-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.Millennium.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-users > _______________________________________________ Tinyos-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.Millennium.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-users
